To determine the congruence transformation that resulted in triangle \( \triangle DEF \) from triangle \( \triangle ABC \), we will analyze the options provided.
-
Translation followed by Rotation:
- Shifting \( \triangle ABC \) 2 units to the right and 2 units up, followed by a rotation of 180° counterclockwise could perfectly change its location and orientation.
-
Reflection followed by Translation:
- Reflecting \( \triangle ABC \) across the y-axis, then shifting it also matches transformations that can lead to a congruent triangle.
-
Translation to the Left and Reflection:
- Shifting left and then reflecting across the y-axis is another sequence of transformations.
-
Rotation followed by Translation:
- Rotating \( \triangle ABC \) by 180° and then shifting also produces another combination to get \( \triangle DEF \).
Analysis on outcomes:
- The possibility of a rotation or reflection would keep the size and shape the same, and a translation simply moves the shape without changing it.
To finalize, without specific coordinate information about points \( A, B, C, D, E, F \), it’s hard to directly calculate which transformation applies. However, since translating followed by rotation is a common combination for congruence transformations and includes an orientation change (rotation by 180°), it’s likely the most fitting if we want an ending triangle in a different location yet match in geometry.
Thus, the answer likely is: \( \triangle ABC \) was shifted 2 units to the right and 2 units up, then rotated 180° (counterclockwise).