Ask a New Question
Menu

How did the United States v. Lopez court case reflect the idea of federalism? (1 point) Responses The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government violated the Tenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government violated the Tenth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government acted against the necessary and proper clause. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government acted against the necessary and proper clause. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government’s actions did not have to do with regulating commerce. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government’s actions did not have to do with regulating commerce. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government acted according to its powers granted by the Constitution.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The correct response is: **The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government’s actions did not have to do with regulating commerce.**

United States v. Lopez (1995) was a landmark case that addressed the balance of power between the federal government and the states, reflecting the principles of federalism. The Supreme Court struck down a federal law that banned guns in school zones, ruling that it exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause. This decision reinforced the idea that there are limits to federal power, highlighting the importance of state sovereignty and the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states.