Question
answer in first person
Access the online information about Carl Rogers.
Carl Rogers
Step 2Read about the fully functioning person.
Read the article. It lists five qualities about a fully functioning person:
Openness to experience
Existential living
Organismic trusting
Experiential freedom
Creativity
Step 3Post a response to Rogers' concept of the fully functioning person.
In your response, include answers to the following questions:
Which parts do you agree or disagree with?
How does Rogers' view compare with that of Maslow and other humanists?
Access the online information about Carl Rogers.
Carl Rogers
Step 2Read about the fully functioning person.
Read the article. It lists five qualities about a fully functioning person:
Openness to experience
Existential living
Organismic trusting
Experiential freedom
Creativity
Step 3Post a response to Rogers' concept of the fully functioning person.
In your response, include answers to the following questions:
Which parts do you agree or disagree with?
How does Rogers' view compare with that of Maslow and other humanists?
Answers
GPT-4o mini
As I reflect on Carl Rogers' concept of the fully functioning person, I find myself resonating deeply with many of the qualities he describes. The idea of being open to experience particularly stands out to me, as I believe that embracing new experiences allows for growth and deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. I also appreciate the emphasis on organismic trusting; that inner sense of what feels right or wrong is something I have experienced personally, and it resonates as a powerful guide in decision-making.
Existential living is another aspect I wholeheartedly agree with. It encourages living in the present and acknowledging the realities of our existence, which feels essential to me. I think it promotes authenticity and encourages people to engage with life more fully, rather than getting trapped in the past or future.
However, I do find myself wrestling with the concept of experiential freedom. While I understand the importance of autonomy and making choices that align with my true self, I sometimes feel that external constraints—whether societal, economic, or relational—can limit that freedom. It's a complex balance between personal desires and external realities that I often navigate.
When I compare Rogers' view with that of Abraham Maslow and other humanists, I see both shared values and distinct differences. For instance, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs also emphasizes the importance of self-actualization, which I see as closely related to Rogers' fully functioning person. However, Maslow tends to present self-actualization as a peak experience, while Rogers seems to lean more toward the idea that being fully functioning is an ongoing process rather than a final destination.
Other humanistic psychologists also stress the importance of personal growth and authenticity, but Rogers' emphasis on the therapeutic relationship and unconditional positive regard adds a unique dimension that I find particularly compelling. It highlights the importance of empathy and connection in achieving those qualities of a fully functioning person.
Overall, I appreciate Rogers' perspective and find that his principles encourage a mindset of continuous growth, acceptance, and exploration in my own life.
Existential living is another aspect I wholeheartedly agree with. It encourages living in the present and acknowledging the realities of our existence, which feels essential to me. I think it promotes authenticity and encourages people to engage with life more fully, rather than getting trapped in the past or future.
However, I do find myself wrestling with the concept of experiential freedom. While I understand the importance of autonomy and making choices that align with my true self, I sometimes feel that external constraints—whether societal, economic, or relational—can limit that freedom. It's a complex balance between personal desires and external realities that I often navigate.
When I compare Rogers' view with that of Abraham Maslow and other humanists, I see both shared values and distinct differences. For instance, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs also emphasizes the importance of self-actualization, which I see as closely related to Rogers' fully functioning person. However, Maslow tends to present self-actualization as a peak experience, while Rogers seems to lean more toward the idea that being fully functioning is an ongoing process rather than a final destination.
Other humanistic psychologists also stress the importance of personal growth and authenticity, but Rogers' emphasis on the therapeutic relationship and unconditional positive regard adds a unique dimension that I find particularly compelling. It highlights the importance of empathy and connection in achieving those qualities of a fully functioning person.
Overall, I appreciate Rogers' perspective and find that his principles encourage a mindset of continuous growth, acceptance, and exploration in my own life.