Use the table to answer the question.
The Greek City-States Social Structure
Upper class: aristoi
Wealthy citizens
Owned agricultural land and equipment
Held positions in government
Middle class: artisans
Skilled craftsmen
Provided specialized goods and services
Granted citizenship and voting rights
Lower class: perioikoi
Owned less-valuable land
Granted citizenship and voting rights
Agricultural workers outside the city
Varied among polis
Women
Unable to vote
Unable to own land
Did not have the same rights and privileges as men
Rights varied by polis
Laborers and enslaved people
Unable to vote
Unable to own land
Relied on their employer
Had no legal rights
Provided agricultural services
Foreign citizens
Not granted full rights
Not granted full citizenship
Could achieve citizenship based on resources
Examine the social classes of the ancient Greek poleis. In 3–5 sentences, discuss the differences among the social classes.
(4 points)
1 month ago
1 month ago
In 3–5 sentences, analyze how a contribution made to math or science by a Greek scholar is still significant today.(4 points)
1 month ago
One of the most significant contributions to mathematics made by the Greek scholar Euclid is his work in geometry, particularly through his treatise "Elements." This foundational text systematically organized and presented the principles of geometry, establishing axioms and logical proofs that have framed mathematical education for centuries. Euclidean geometry remains a fundamental aspect of modern mathematics, influencing various fields, including architecture, engineering, and computer science. Additionally, the methods of logical reasoning and deductive proofs pioneered by Euclid continue to be essential in mathematical thought and education today, underscoring the lasting impact of his work on contemporary science and mathematics.
1 month ago
Answer the following question in 3–5 sentences. Why was the development and spread of Christianity relatively slow in the Roman Empire?(4 points)
1 month ago
The development and spread of Christianity in the Roman Empire was relatively slow due to several factors. Initially, Christianity was viewed with suspicion by Roman authorities, who saw it as a sect that threatened traditional Roman values and religious practices. The lack of a centralized organization and the early persecution of Christians contributed to its slow growth, as believers often had to practice their faith in secrecy. Furthermore, the vast and diverse nature of the empire meant that communication and travel were challenging, hindering the rapid dissemination of Christian teachings. Cultural differences and the entrenched beliefs of existing pagan religions also posed barriers to the acceptance of Christianity among the broader population.
1 month ago
In 3–5 sentences, compare the motivations for territorial expansion between the Roman Empire under Trajan and the Byzantine Empire under Justinian I.(4 points)
1 month ago
The motivations for territorial expansion in the Roman Empire under Trajan and the Byzantine Empire under Justinian I differed in their contexts and objectives. Trajan's expansion focused on acquiring new territories for military glory, resource acquisition, and consolidation of power, exemplified by his conquests in Dacia, which aimed to enhance Rome's resources and prestige. In contrast, Justinian I was motivated by a desire to restore the former glory of the Roman Empire, aiming to reclaim lost territories in the West, such as Italy and North Africa, through military campaigns and legal reforms. While both leaders sought to enhance their empires, Trajan's conquests were driven largely by immediate military strategy and economic exploitation, whereas Justinian's ambitions were more ideologically rooted in the concept of a revived Roman Empire and the spread of Christianity. Ultimately, each expansion reflected their respective empires' historical context and the rulers’ visions for their legacies.
1 month ago
In 1–2 sentences, compare the motivations and conquests of the Ottoman Empire and the Umayyad dynasty.(2 points)
1 month ago
The motivations for conquest in both the Ottoman Empire and the Umayyad dynasty were largely driven by the desire for territorial expansion and the spread of Islam, but the Ottoman Empire also aimed to consolidate political power and establish a diverse and multi-ethnic empire. While the Umayyad dynasty focused on rapid expansion across North Africa and into Spain, the Ottomans pursued a more gradual conquest, including the significant capture of Constantinople, which marked a pivotal transformation in their rule and the Islamic world.
1 month ago
“In the two centuries following Muhammad’s death, the relationship between religious and secular authorities changed substantially.” In 1–2 sentences, develop a logical argument in support of this statement.(2 points)
1 month ago