The necessary reason for the Supreme Court to check the other branches using judicial review is to create a balance of power in the government and to prevent the legislative branch from passing unconstitutional laws. This mechanism ensures that no single branch of government exceeds its authority or violates the Constitution, thereby maintaining the rule of law and protecting individual rights.
Why is it necessary for the Supreme Court to check the other branches using judicial review?(1 point) Responses to create a balance of power in the government to create a balance of power in the government to keep the president from signing executive orders to keep the president from signing executive orders to prevent the legislative branch from passing unconstitutional laws to prevent the legislative branch from passing unconstitutional laws to give the Supreme Court power over the other two branches
11 answers
What is the description of a concurring opinion issued along with the Supreme Court’s ruling on a case?(1 point) Responses an opinion that either affirms or vacates the ruling of a lower court an opinion that either affirms or vacates the ruling of a lower court an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but does not list the names of the justices an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but does not list the names of the justices an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but disagrees with the rationale an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but disagrees with the rationale an opinion that disagrees with the majority opinion
A concurring opinion is an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but disagrees with the rationale. It allows justices to express their individual reasoning or interpretations while still supporting the final decision reached by the majority.
How does judicial activism affect the court’s decisions?(1 point) Responses The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome. The court will determine whether there is clear violation of the Constitution and allow elected representatives to decide the outcome. The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent. The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent. The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues. The court will exercise judicial review and refrain from deciding legal issues. The court will allow the voting population determine if there is a constitutional issue.
Judicial activism affects the court’s decisions in that the court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent. This means that the court is more likely to take an active role in interpreting the law and can overturn or challenge the actions of the legislative and executive branches based on its interpretations of constitutional principles.
Which of the following people favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution?(1 point) Responses Charles Evan Hughes Charles Evan Hughes Alexander Hamilton Alexander Hamilton George Washington George Washington Thomas Jefferson
Among the options given, Alexander Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in a broad reading of the Constitution, which allowed for a more flexible understanding of federal powers, contrasting with those who advocated for a strict interpretation, such as Thomas Jefferson.
In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which amendment was used by the Supreme Court to justify applying the Fourth Amendment to the states?(1 point) Responses the Fourteenth Amendment the Fourteenth Amendment the Fifth Amendment the Fifth Amendment the Sixth Amendment the Sixth Amendment the Second Amendment
In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court used the Fourteenth Amendment to justify applying the Fourth Amendment to the states. Specifically, it invoked the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to extend the exclusionary rule to state courts.
What act did the Supreme Court declare unconstitutional in the Marbury v. Madison case?(1 point) Responses the Affordable Care Act the Affordable Care Act the Judiciary Act of 1789 the Judiciary Act of 1789 the Judiciary Act of 1801 the Judiciary Act of 1801 the Civil Rights Act
In the Marbury v. Madison case, the Supreme Court declared the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional. This decision established the principle of judicial review, allowing the Court to invalidate legislation that conflicts with the Constitution.
1 answer