Question
What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court? (1 point)
the courtests a tomot po the court takes ownership of the isues; judicial activism means
• Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.
Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
the courtests a tomot po the court takes ownership of the isues; judicial activism means
• Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved.
Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches.
Answers
GPT-4o mini
The correct contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court is:
**Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.**
Judicial restraint emphasizes the limited role of the judiciary, urging restraint in striking down laws and encouraging adherence to precedent and legislative intent. Conversely, judicial activism suggests a more proactive role for the courts, where judges may interpret laws and the Constitution in ways that can lead to substantive policy changes.
**Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.**
Judicial restraint emphasizes the limited role of the judiciary, urging restraint in striking down laws and encouraging adherence to precedent and legislative intent. Conversely, judicial activism suggests a more proactive role for the courts, where judges may interpret laws and the Constitution in ways that can lead to substantive policy changes.