To transform the first graph (which is a proportional relationship) into a non-proportional graph that has the same y-intercept as the second graph, you need to account for the $20 setup fee that the second business charges.
- The first business charges $12 per t-shirt, which can be represented as the equation \( y = 12x \), where \( y \) is the total cost and \( x \) is the number of t-shirts.
- The second business's cost can be represented as \( y = 11x + 20 \).
The y-intercept of the second graph is 20, meaning when 0 t-shirts are ordered, the cost is $20 due to the setup fee.
To change the first graph's y-intercept from 0 (when \( x = 0 \)) to 20, you need to shift it up by 20 units. This would transform the equation to:
\[ y = 12x + 20 \]
So, the correct transformation to make the first graph into a non-proportional graph with the same y-intercept as the second graph is:
Up 20