Asked by Water
C = 3/2(k - 91) solve for k
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the equation \( C = \frac{3}{2}(k - 91) \) for \( k \), follow these steps:
1. Start by multiplying both sides by \( \frac{2}{3} \) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
\frac{2}{3}C = k - 91
\]
2. Next, isolate \( k \) by adding \( 91 \) to both sides:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
Thus, the solution for \( k \) is:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
1. Start by multiplying both sides by \( \frac{2}{3} \) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
\frac{2}{3}C = k - 91
\]
2. Next, isolate \( k \) by adding \( 91 \) to both sides:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
Thus, the solution for \( k \) is:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The expression for \( k \) is:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
This expression is already in a simplified form, combining the fraction and the constant. However, if you want to express it in a single fraction, you can find a common denominator.
To combine \( \frac{2}{3}C \) and \( 91 \) into a single fraction, convert \( 91 \) to a fraction with a denominator of \( 3 \):
\[
91 = \frac{273}{3}
\]
Now you can write:
\[
k = \frac{2C}{3} + \frac{273}{3} = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
So, the simplified expression for \( k \) can also be written as:
\[
k = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
This is another simplified form of the expression.
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
This expression is already in a simplified form, combining the fraction and the constant. However, if you want to express it in a single fraction, you can find a common denominator.
To combine \( \frac{2}{3}C \) and \( 91 \) into a single fraction, convert \( 91 \) to a fraction with a denominator of \( 3 \):
\[
91 = \frac{273}{3}
\]
Now you can write:
\[
k = \frac{2C}{3} + \frac{273}{3} = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
So, the simplified expression for \( k \) can also be written as:
\[
k = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
This is another simplified form of the expression.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To express \( k \) without brackets and in a more standard form, you can rewrite the expression:
Starting from the previously simplified formula:
\[
k = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
There are a couple of ways you could express it in "normal form," but let’s remove the fraction and express it more explicitly:
1. You can keep it as is, or
2. Multiply through by 3 to eliminate the fraction:
\[
3k = 2C + 273
\]
Now, if you're looking for \( k \) in terms of \( C \) without brackets or fractions, the first form with brackets is often more common, while the second form could represent the direct relationship without a fraction.
If you prefer \( k \) isolated and written plainly (not with fractions):
So the answer in a "normal form" without fractions is:
\[
3k = 2C + 273
\]
Alternatively, if you want \( k \) isolated, you could express it as:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
Both forms are valid depending on whether you wish to maintain fractions or not. Would you like me to clarify any further?
Starting from the previously simplified formula:
\[
k = \frac{2C + 273}{3}
\]
There are a couple of ways you could express it in "normal form," but let’s remove the fraction and express it more explicitly:
1. You can keep it as is, or
2. Multiply through by 3 to eliminate the fraction:
\[
3k = 2C + 273
\]
Now, if you're looking for \( k \) in terms of \( C \) without brackets or fractions, the first form with brackets is often more common, while the second form could represent the direct relationship without a fraction.
If you prefer \( k \) isolated and written plainly (not with fractions):
So the answer in a "normal form" without fractions is:
\[
3k = 2C + 273
\]
Alternatively, if you want \( k \) isolated, you could express it as:
\[
k = \frac{2}{3}C + 91
\]
Both forms are valid depending on whether you wish to maintain fractions or not. Would you like me to clarify any further?
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the equation \( mp + mq = x \) for \( m \), follow these steps:
1. Factor out \( m \) from the left side of the equation:
\[
m(p + q) = x
\]
2. Now, divide both sides by \( (p + q) \) (assuming \( p + q \neq 0 \)) to isolate \( m \):
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
Thus, the solution for \( m \) is:
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
1. Factor out \( m \) from the left side of the equation:
\[
m(p + q) = x
\]
2. Now, divide both sides by \( (p + q) \) (assuming \( p + q \neq 0 \)) to isolate \( m \):
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
Thus, the solution for \( m \) is:
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The solution for \( m \) derived from the equation \( mp + mq = x \) is:
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
In "normal form" (without fractions), we rearrange the equation. To eliminate the fraction, we can multiply both sides by \( (p + q) \):
Starting from:
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
Multiply both sides by \( (p + q) \):
\[
m(p + q) = x
\]
This is a valid form of the equation representing the same relationship, but rewritten without isolating \( m \) as a fraction.
If you are looking for either an equation or statement involving \( m \) that does not have a fraction, you can use:
\[
mp + mq = x
\]
So in "normal form," we can either keep it as \( m(p + q) = x \) or return to the original relationship, depending on the context. Would you like a specific form or another type of representation?
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
In "normal form" (without fractions), we rearrange the equation. To eliminate the fraction, we can multiply both sides by \( (p + q) \):
Starting from:
\[
m = \frac{x}{p + q}
\]
Multiply both sides by \( (p + q) \):
\[
m(p + q) = x
\]
This is a valid form of the equation representing the same relationship, but rewritten without isolating \( m \) as a fraction.
If you are looking for either an equation or statement involving \( m \) that does not have a fraction, you can use:
\[
mp + mq = x
\]
So in "normal form," we can either keep it as \( m(p + q) = x \) or return to the original relationship, depending on the context. Would you like a specific form or another type of representation?
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.