Asked by I_EAT_EVERYDAY
What is the slope and the y -intercept of the equation 9+27 over 2x = −3 over 2y. Write the y -intercept as an ordered pair.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the slope and the y-intercept of the given equation \( \frac{9 + 27}{2x} = -\frac{3}{2}y \), we first simplify the equation.
First, we can rewrite the left side:
\[
\frac{36}{2x} = -\frac{3}{2}y
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
\frac{18}{x} = -\frac{3}{2}y
\]
Next, we can multiply both sides by \(2x\) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
36 = -3xy
\]
To express \(y\) in terms of \(x\), we can rearrange this equation:
\[
3xy = -36
\]
Now, divide by \(3x\):
\[
y = -\frac{36}{3x} = -\frac{12}{x}
\]
However, the equation is still in a complicated form. We will rearrange this into the slope-intercept form, \(y = mx + b\). To do that, we can multiply both sides by \(x\) to make it easier to identify:
\[
xy = -12
\]
This implies
\[
y = -\frac{12}{x}
\]
Rearranging doesn't really help us in identifying slope. Instead, let's try plugging in values to see how the equation behaves.
Alternatively, we can rewrite \(y = -\frac{12}{x}\) as:
\[
y = -12 \cdot \frac{1}{x}
\]
Now, this isn't a linear function, but if we consider the equation from yet another perspective, rearranging the original provided equation directly into \(y\) terms:
Starting from \( \frac{36}{2x} = -\frac{3}{2}y \):
Multiplying it through by \(2x\):
\[
36 = -3xy
\]
And moving all terms involving \(y\) to one side gives us:
\[
xy = -36
\]
This means it can be seen as inversely proportional (not a straight line in standard slope-intercept form).
However, if we analyze around specific coordinates, and find the y-intercept, we observe that:
When \(x=0\), \(y\) has no defined value (since division by zero is undefined); thus the transformation does not lead to a visual line.
Thus, the nature of this equation is hyperbolic rather than linear, meaning it does not have a slope and an intercept we can describe.
Conclusively, the situation is as such: the equation does not yield a slope or an ordered pair as a y-intercept due to its nature, which is critical for linear equations. It forms a hyperbola. Therefore, traditional linear analysis does not apply.
Should you need more context, feel free to ask!
First, we can rewrite the left side:
\[
\frac{36}{2x} = -\frac{3}{2}y
\]
This simplifies to:
\[
\frac{18}{x} = -\frac{3}{2}y
\]
Next, we can multiply both sides by \(2x\) to eliminate the fraction:
\[
36 = -3xy
\]
To express \(y\) in terms of \(x\), we can rearrange this equation:
\[
3xy = -36
\]
Now, divide by \(3x\):
\[
y = -\frac{36}{3x} = -\frac{12}{x}
\]
However, the equation is still in a complicated form. We will rearrange this into the slope-intercept form, \(y = mx + b\). To do that, we can multiply both sides by \(x\) to make it easier to identify:
\[
xy = -12
\]
This implies
\[
y = -\frac{12}{x}
\]
Rearranging doesn't really help us in identifying slope. Instead, let's try plugging in values to see how the equation behaves.
Alternatively, we can rewrite \(y = -\frac{12}{x}\) as:
\[
y = -12 \cdot \frac{1}{x}
\]
Now, this isn't a linear function, but if we consider the equation from yet another perspective, rearranging the original provided equation directly into \(y\) terms:
Starting from \( \frac{36}{2x} = -\frac{3}{2}y \):
Multiplying it through by \(2x\):
\[
36 = -3xy
\]
And moving all terms involving \(y\) to one side gives us:
\[
xy = -36
\]
This means it can be seen as inversely proportional (not a straight line in standard slope-intercept form).
However, if we analyze around specific coordinates, and find the y-intercept, we observe that:
When \(x=0\), \(y\) has no defined value (since division by zero is undefined); thus the transformation does not lead to a visual line.
Thus, the nature of this equation is hyperbolic rather than linear, meaning it does not have a slope and an intercept we can describe.
Conclusively, the situation is as such: the equation does not yield a slope or an ordered pair as a y-intercept due to its nature, which is critical for linear equations. It forms a hyperbola. Therefore, traditional linear analysis does not apply.
Should you need more context, feel free to ask!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.