Rewrite the equation 52x−8−1=9 as two equations joined by “and.”(1 point) Responses 52x−8−1=9 and x≠8 Start Fraction 5 over 2 x minus 8 End Fraction minus 1 equals 9 and x does not equal 8 52x−8=9 and x≠−8 Start Fraction 5 over 2 x minus 8 End Fraction equals 9 and x does not equal negative 8 52x−8−1=9 and x≠4 Start Fraction 5 over 2 x minus 8 End Fraction minus 1 equals 9 and x does not equal 4 52x−8−1=9 and x≠−4

3 answers

To rewrite the equation \( 52x - 8 - 1 = 9 \) as two equations joined by "and," we first simplify the equation:

  1. Combine like terms: \[ 52x - 9 = 9 \]

  2. Move \( 9 \) to the other side: \[ 52x = 18 \]

  3. Solve for \( x \): \[ x = \frac{18}{52} = \frac{9}{26} \]

Now, we can write it as two equations, including the solution and the condition based on the simplified form. The condition regarding values that may cause any issues or restrictions in this context would typically revolve around potential denominators or constraints.

The best answer is: \[ 52x - 8 - 1 = 9 \quad \text{and} \quad x \neq k \text{ (where \( k \) would be any discontinuous point to consider, if applicable.)} \]

However, since we have no specific restriction based on the original equation, you would still get a format like: \[ 52x - 9 = 9 \quad \text{and} \quad x \neq k \]

Among the choices provided, the match with the derived solution and equation may involve any interpretations of when the equation equals something or when it maintains a defined value.

In the context of the simplified form:

  • The best response among what appears to be the reduced forms is:
    • \( 52x - 8 = 9 \) and \( x \neq -8 \).

But the specific condition should reflect actual roots or determination based on context provided. Thus if drawing from common interpretations:

  • The correct formatting looks like: \[ 52x - 9 = 9 \quad \text{and} \quad x \neq \text{conditioned variable.} \]

In conclusion:

  • Choose wisely based on provided options as they structure the initial equation and any accompanying conditions you've derived in context.
so, which one is it

Apologies for the confusion in my previous message. Let's clarify the equation you provided and identify the correct option.

The original equation is: \[ 52x - 8 - 1 = 9 \]

This simplifies to: \[ 52x - 9 = 9 \] Then: \[ 52x = 18 \] So: \[ x = \frac{18}{52} = \frac{9}{26} \]

Now we want to write this as two equations joined by "and." The structure will be:

  1. The equation simplified,
  2. A condition on \( x \).

Based on your provided options, the only one that properly reflects the equation is:

20. Start Fraction 5 over 2 x minus 8 End Fraction minus 1 equals 9 and x does not equal 4.

But based on the given simplification, there is no value "4" that affects the range of the solution as per simplification. Logically, situations like roots or undefined portions would typically define those values; however, as stated correct option needs context from correctness based on your initial provision.

If you're looking for the "and" counterparts that would fit standard mathematical conventions, please choose with context as actual conditions based on the values derived earlier fit from a logical standpoint.

If I were to specifically guide based on your equations explicitly, I'd need the context of explicit restriction or output to decide the most fitting consequence of behavior if no piece stands intended.