The Three-Fifths Compromise, established during the 1787 Constitutional Convention, was a pivotal yet deeply contentious agreement that sought to balance the political power between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states. From the perspective of the government, particularly the Southern states, the compromise was an essential mechanism for ensuring representation in Congress. By counting three-fifths of the enslaved population toward a state's representation, slaveholding states could amplify their influence in the House of Representatives, thus protecting their economic interests and way of life rooted in slavery. This compromise reflected the political realities of the time, where the economic imperatives of the Southern states were pitted against the moral concerns of the emerging Northern states.
For enslaved individuals, the Three-Fifths Compromise represented a blatant dehumanization and systemic injustice. By being counted as only a fraction of a person, enslaved individuals were stripped of their humanity and agency in the political sphere. While the compromise may have provided some Southern states with increased power, it failed to consider the fundamental rights and dignity of the enslaved population. The very mechanism designed to strengthen the political presence of slaveholding states simultaneously rendered the enslaved people invisible and voiceless in their own rights. In this way, the Three-Fifths Compromise underscores the paradox of a nation founded on liberty and equality while perpetuating a system of brutal inequality and oppression.
1 answer