Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?(1 point)

Responses

A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.

The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.
The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.

Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.

The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.

1 answer

The correct reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source is:

The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.

Understanding a source's opinions can help historians interpret the context and perspective from which the facts are presented, which is crucial for a comprehensive analysis of historical events.