Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
According to the Associative Property, which expression is equivalent to 30m+(21m−53)+(18−2m) ?(1 point) Responses (49m−53)+16...Question
According to the Associative Property, which expression is equivalent to 30m+(21m−53)+(18−2m)?(1 point)
Responses
(49m−53)+16
left parenthesis 49 m minus 53 right parenthesis plus 16
(30m+21m)+(18−2m)
left parenthesis 30 m plus 21 m right parenthesis plus left parenthesis 18 minus 2 m right parenthesis
53m−35
53 m minus 35
51m+(−53+18)−2m
Responses
(49m−53)+16
left parenthesis 49 m minus 53 right parenthesis plus 16
(30m+21m)+(18−2m)
left parenthesis 30 m plus 21 m right parenthesis plus left parenthesis 18 minus 2 m right parenthesis
53m−35
53 m minus 35
51m+(−53+18)−2m
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which expression is equivalent to \(30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)\) using the Associative Property, let's simplify the given expression step by step.
1. Start with the original expression:
\[
30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)
\]
2. Combine the terms inside the parentheses:
\[
30m + 21m - 53 + 18 - 2m
\]
3. Now, combine the like terms:
- For the \(m\) terms: \(30m + 21m - 2m = 49m\)
- For the constant terms: \(-53 + 18 = -35\)
4. Now, we can rewrite the expression:
\[
49m - 35
\]
Now we compare it with the provided options:
1. \((49m - 53) + 16\)
2. \((30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)\)
3. \(53m - 35\)
4. \(51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m\)
The expression we simplified to is \(49m - 35\).
None of the options produce exactly \(49m - 35\) directly, but the interpretation involves rearranging the expressions.
The closest we have based on associative grouping is the second option:
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \text{ since it correctly complies with associativity, but needs further simplification.}
\]
However, our final simplified form of \(49m - 35\) is inconsistent with any direct choice as none is perfectly equal to this.
So the answer aligning closest with the associative property would remain:
**Response: (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)**.
1. Start with the original expression:
\[
30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m)
\]
2. Combine the terms inside the parentheses:
\[
30m + 21m - 53 + 18 - 2m
\]
3. Now, combine the like terms:
- For the \(m\) terms: \(30m + 21m - 2m = 49m\)
- For the constant terms: \(-53 + 18 = -35\)
4. Now, we can rewrite the expression:
\[
49m - 35
\]
Now we compare it with the provided options:
1. \((49m - 53) + 16\)
2. \((30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)\)
3. \(53m - 35\)
4. \(51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m\)
The expression we simplified to is \(49m - 35\).
None of the options produce exactly \(49m - 35\) directly, but the interpretation involves rearranging the expressions.
The closest we have based on associative grouping is the second option:
\[
(30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \text{ since it correctly complies with associativity, but needs further simplification.}
\]
However, our final simplified form of \(49m - 35\) is inconsistent with any direct choice as none is perfectly equal to this.
So the answer aligning closest with the associative property would remain:
**Response: (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m)**.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.