Why did the Algonquins become allies with the French? Select all that apply. (1 point) Responses They were afraid that the French would take their land. They were afraid that the French would take their land. They wanted to maintain their strong fur trading relationship. They wanted to maintain their strong fur trading relationship. They wanted to help the French secure land east of the Mississippi. They wanted to help the French secure land east of the Mississippi. The French respected Native American land and did not destroy their hunting grounds.

The reasons the Algonquins became allies with the French include:

1. They wanted to maintain their strong fur trading relationship.
2. The French respected Native American land and did not destroy their hunting grounds.

These factors contributed significantly to the alliance between the Algonquins and the French.

are you sure

Yes, I can confirm that the two reasons I provided are historically accurate in the context of the Algonquin alliance with the French.

1. **They wanted to maintain their strong fur trading relationship**: The French were heavily involved in the fur trade, and the Algonquin saw a beneficial partnership in this area.

2. **The French respected Native American land and did not destroy their hunting grounds**: Unlike some other European powers, the French tended to have a more respectful approach towards Native American lands and rights, which fostered goodwill and alliances.

The other options you presented, such as the fear of land loss and wanting to help the French secure land, do not directly align with the historical context of the Algonquin motivation for alliance. They were primarily driven by economic interests and mutual respect.

thankyou

You're welcome! If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. Happy studying!

How did Florida change after the end of the French and Indian War? Select all that apply. (1 point) Responses Britain gained control of the territory from Spain. Britain gained control of the territory from Spain. West Florida developed at a much faster rate than other parts of the state. West Florida developed at a much faster rate than other parts of the state. Slavery was permitted to entice Southerners to settle. Slavery was permitted to entice Southerners to settle. The territory was divided into four distinct territories: North, South, East, and West. The territory was divided into four distinct territories: North, South, East, and West.

After the end of the French and Indian War, the following changes occurred in Florida:

1. **Britain gained control of the territory from Spain**: Following the war, as part of the terms of the Treaty of Paris (1763), Spain ceded Florida to Britain.

2. **Slavery was permitted to entice Southerners to settle**: To encourage settlement, especially from the Southern colonies, the British allowed slavery in Florida.

The other options regarding the development rate of West Florida and the division into four distinct territories are not historically accurate regarding the immediate changes in Florida following the French and Indian War.

In the text you read this about the aftermath of the Boston Massacre: The soldiers were arrested and tried in court. John Adams agreed to defend them, saying that they deserved a fair trial. He wanted to show the world that the colonists believed in justice, even if the British government did not. At the trial, Adams argued that the crowd had provoked the soldiers. His arguments convinced the jury. In the end, the heaviest punishment any soldier received was a branding on the hand. Question Use the excerpt to answer the question. How could John Adams defend the British soldiers but still be seen as a Patriot? (1 point) Responses Adams knew that many Patriots wanted the British soldiers to be set free. Adams knew that many Patriots wanted the British soldiers to be set free. Adams defended the soldiers because many Patriots asked him to. Adams defended the soldiers because many Patriots asked him to. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice. Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice. Adams defended the soldiers because he thought it would make the British pity the Patriot cause.

The best response to explain how John Adams could defend the British soldiers while still being seen as a Patriot is:

**Adams defended the soldiers while defending the Patriots' belief in justice.**

This highlights that Adams prioritized the principle of justice and fair trials, which aligned with the values of the Patriot movement, despite the broader sentiment against the British soldiers.

“Our Colonies must be the biggest Beggars in the World, if such small Duties appear to be intolerable Burdens in their Eyes.” —“Pacificus,” Maryland Gazette, March 20, 1766 Question Use the excerpt to answer the question. This excerpt is from a citizen in England in response to the colonial outrage toward the Stamp Act. What central argument of the American colonists against the Stamp Act is not understood by the writer? (1 point) Responses that trade was heavily restricted due to the taxes, which made it difficult for the colonists to make enough money to live let alone pay the taxes that trade was heavily restricted due to the taxes, which made it difficult for the colonists to make enough money to live let alone pay the taxes that although the tax is small, it is the idea that the colonists have to repay the British government for a war they did not support that is unjust that although the tax is small, it is the idea that the colonists have to repay the British government for a war they did not support that is unjust that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax that the tax may seem small to those in England but for the American colonists it is a very large amount of money

The central argument of the American colonists against the Stamp Act that is not understood by the writer is:

**that it is not the amount of tax that is the problem but rather the fact that the colonists were not involved in passing the tax.**

This response captures the colonists' belief in "no taxation without representation," emphasizing that their main grievance was not just the tax itself but the principle that they had no direct voice in the legislative process that imposed the tax.