Question
Consider the expression (16−12)2+5(8+22)53−(1+4)2. What is the simplified numerator?(1 point)
Responses
54
4^2+60
76
100
Responses
54
4^2+60
76
100
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's simplify the expression step by step:
The expression is:
\[
(16-12)^2 + 5(8 + 22) \cdot 53 - (1 + 4)^2
\]
1. Calculate the components in the parentheses:
- \(16 - 12 = 4\)
- \(1 + 4 = 5\)
- \(8 + 22 = 30\)
2. Substitute these values back into the expression:
- So we have:
\[
(4)^2 + 5(30) \cdot 53 - (5)^2
\]
3. Compute the squares:
- \(4^2 = 16\)
- \(5^2 = 25\)
4. Substitute these values back into the expression:
- Now we have:
\[
16 + 5(30) \cdot 53 - 25
\]
5. Compute \(5(30)\):
- \(5 \cdot 30 = 150\)
6. Substitute back into the expression:
- So we have:
\[
16 + 150 \cdot 53 - 25
\]
7. Now, calculate \(150 \cdot 53\):
- \(150 \cdot 53 = 7950\)
8. Substitute this back:
- We now have:
\[
16 + 7950 - 25
\]
9. Finally, perform the remaining arithmetic:
- \(16 - 25 = -9\)
- \(-9 + 7950 = 7941\)
So the simplified expression is \(7941\). If we need to find the numerator of the expression, it's unclear what the problem means since it doesn't indicate a fraction. However, based on the provided options, let's go over them once more to check:
Responses:
- 54
- \(4^2 + 60\) which is \(16 + 60 = 76\) — this is close to 76
- 76 — (This looks correct if these numbers are not fractions)
- 100
The correct simplified numerator based on the computation is not distinctly available in the given options because we found \(7941\).
If we consider any portions of the expression leading to 100, we note that it’s not part of it. So out of the provided options, **76** seems the most plausible response because \(4^2 + 60\) sums up to 76.
Thus, the final answer is:
**76**
The expression is:
\[
(16-12)^2 + 5(8 + 22) \cdot 53 - (1 + 4)^2
\]
1. Calculate the components in the parentheses:
- \(16 - 12 = 4\)
- \(1 + 4 = 5\)
- \(8 + 22 = 30\)
2. Substitute these values back into the expression:
- So we have:
\[
(4)^2 + 5(30) \cdot 53 - (5)^2
\]
3. Compute the squares:
- \(4^2 = 16\)
- \(5^2 = 25\)
4. Substitute these values back into the expression:
- Now we have:
\[
16 + 5(30) \cdot 53 - 25
\]
5. Compute \(5(30)\):
- \(5 \cdot 30 = 150\)
6. Substitute back into the expression:
- So we have:
\[
16 + 150 \cdot 53 - 25
\]
7. Now, calculate \(150 \cdot 53\):
- \(150 \cdot 53 = 7950\)
8. Substitute this back:
- We now have:
\[
16 + 7950 - 25
\]
9. Finally, perform the remaining arithmetic:
- \(16 - 25 = -9\)
- \(-9 + 7950 = 7941\)
So the simplified expression is \(7941\). If we need to find the numerator of the expression, it's unclear what the problem means since it doesn't indicate a fraction. However, based on the provided options, let's go over them once more to check:
Responses:
- 54
- \(4^2 + 60\) which is \(16 + 60 = 76\) — this is close to 76
- 76 — (This looks correct if these numbers are not fractions)
- 100
The correct simplified numerator based on the computation is not distinctly available in the given options because we found \(7941\).
If we consider any portions of the expression leading to 100, we note that it’s not part of it. So out of the provided options, **76** seems the most plausible response because \(4^2 + 60\) sums up to 76.
Thus, the final answer is:
**76**
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.