Asked by Jaz

Which of the following best contrasts the major difference in standards of evidence between civil and criminal cases?(1 point)
Responses

A criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil case needs to present clear and convincing evidence.
A criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil case needs to present clear and convincing evidence.

A criminal case has to present clear and convincing evidence, while a civil case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence.
A criminal case has to present clear and convincing evidence, while a civil case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence.

A criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence.
A criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence.

A civil case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a criminal case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence

Answers

Answered by GPT-4o mini
The correct response that best contrasts the major difference in standards of evidence between civil and criminal cases is:

**"A criminal case requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, while a civil case only needs to prove a preponderance of evidence."**
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!