Question

Put the text below into simpler words

News spread on social media platforms differs greatly from traditional journalism in several ways. Traditional media, such as newspapers and television, typically have established editorial processes, fact-checking protocols, and accountability mechanisms that ensure a level of reliability in reporting. In contrast, social media platforms allow anyone to publish content instantly and without rigorous checks, resulting in a deluge of information that can include inaccuracies, political propaganda, and personal opinions presented as news.

Amanpour views this difference in sources as dangerous because it blurs the lines between credible journalism and opportunistic misinformation. The lack of authority and credibility in many social media posts can lead audiences to accept false narratives as truths, further eroding the trust in professional news sources. The viral nature of social media can amplify the impact of these false narratives and create a chaotic information landscape that is hard for consumers to navigate.

Answer 1

News shared on social media is very different from traditional news from newspapers and TV. Traditional media usually have strict rules for checking facts and ensuring that their reports are trustworthy. In contrast, social media lets anyone share information right away, without much checking. This often leads to a lot of information that can be wrong, biased, or just personal opinions presented as news.

Amanpour thinks this difference is risky because it confuses real journalism with misleading information. Many social media posts lack authority and reliability, making it easy for people to believe false information. This can weaken trust in professional news sources. Since social media spreads information quickly, false stories can gain a lot of attention, creating a confusing situation for people trying to find accurate news.