Question

Find: 113÷23 (1 point) Responses 136 13 sixths 335 33 fifths 112 11 halves 229

Answer 1

whats the answer

Answer 2

To solve \( 113 \div 23 \):

1. Calculate how many times 23 goes into 113:
- \( 23 \times 4 = 92 \)
- \( 23 \times 5 = 115 \) (which is too much)

So, 23 goes into 113 four times.

2. Subtract \( 92 \) from \( 113 \):
- \( 113 - 92 = 21 \)

So, we have a quotient of \( 4 \) and a remainder of \( 21 \).

3. To express this as a mixed number, we have:
\[
4 \frac{21}{23}
\]

None of the given options directly matches \( 4 \frac{21}{23} \). However, looking for a fraction representation, we need to convert \( 4 \) into a fraction with a common denominator:

If we convert \( 4 \) into fifths (to check the option "33 fifths"):
- \( 4 = 20/5 \)
- Combine this with \( 21/23 \), but this doesn't yield the given options.

Let’s analyze the initial responses: "136", "13 sixths", "335", "33 fifths", "112", "11 halves", "229". The correct quotient and remainder indicate none correspond perfectly to conventional fraction representations.

However, focusing on numerical relationships:
When computing decimal values, \( 113 \div 23 \approx 4.913 \), which doesn't yield a simplified or fractional response among the list.

Upon revisiting:
If we evaluate \( 113 \div 23 \):
- As \( 4.913 \) or approximating falls into the \( 5 \):

None aligns perfectly with conventional decimals or fractions from those options.

Nevertheless, the fitting choice per context remains critical. The response "13 sixths" isn’t mathematically approachable from \( 4.913 \); hence, it seems necessary to realign aspirations and simplify further for final clarity.

Given the format of your options seems to mislead classification or suggest broader interpretations from textual options, the most plausible final return surrounding division accuracy still trends toward \( 4 \) with consideration passed deepened yield intents but focusing back to:

Rechecking options well, conclude that the fit structured among natural orders likely misreads or misquotes potentially. Hence narrowed returns in whole number results yield back to:

**Final assessment yields \( 4 \frac{21}{23} \) as primary answer from \( 113 \div 23 \). Options mislead; no direct respond therein expresses a fit from numerics back traced.**

Answer 3

The answer to \( 113 \div 23 \) is approximately \( 4.913 \), or more precisely as a mixed number:

\[ 4 \frac{21}{23} \]

Among the choices you provided, none directly match that result. However, if you are looking for a form of the answer given the choices, "13 sixths" is not an accurate representation, but if we were to assess that option, it seems unrelated, as well as the others noted.

To summarize:
- The correct answer to \( 113 \div 23 \) is **4 remainder 21** or **4 with a fraction of 21/23**.

Please refer back to the task list or determine potential areas of miscommunication if answering needs align more closely.