Asked by find
Solve the following for a: ax−5>18
Answers
Answered by
find
A. a > 23x
B. a = 23+x
C. a = 23x
D. a > 13x
B. a = 23+x
C. a = 23x
D. a > 13x
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the inequality \( ax - 5 > 18 \) for \( a \), follow these steps:
1. Start by isolating the term involving \( a \):
\[
ax - 5 > 18
\]
2. Add 5 to both sides:
\[
ax > 23
\]
3. Now, divide both sides by \( x \) (assuming \( x \neq 0 \)) to solve for \( a \):
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
Thus, the solution for \( a \) in terms of \( x \) is:
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
Keep in mind that the solution is valid for \( x \neq 0 \). Also, depending on the sign of \( x \), you may need to reverse the inequality sign when dividing:
- If \( x > 0 \), then \( a > \frac{23}{x} \).
- If \( x < 0 \), then \( a < \frac{23}{x} \).
If \( x = 0 \), the original inequality \( ax - 5 > 18 \) cannot be evaluated as it leads to an expression involving division by zero.
1. Start by isolating the term involving \( a \):
\[
ax - 5 > 18
\]
2. Add 5 to both sides:
\[
ax > 23
\]
3. Now, divide both sides by \( x \) (assuming \( x \neq 0 \)) to solve for \( a \):
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
Thus, the solution for \( a \) in terms of \( x \) is:
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
Keep in mind that the solution is valid for \( x \neq 0 \). Also, depending on the sign of \( x \), you may need to reverse the inequality sign when dividing:
- If \( x > 0 \), then \( a > \frac{23}{x} \).
- If \( x < 0 \), then \( a < \frac{23}{x} \).
If \( x = 0 \), the original inequality \( ax - 5 > 18 \) cannot be evaluated as it leads to an expression involving division by zero.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's revisit the inequality \( ax - 5 > 18 \) and solve it step by step.
1. We start with the original inequality:
\[
ax - 5 > 18
\]
2. Add 5 to both sides to isolate the term containing \( a \):
\[
ax > 23
\]
3. Now, divide both sides by \( x \) (assuming \( x \neq 0 \)):
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
From here, we need to see which choice corresponds to our result \( a > \frac{23}{x} \).
Given the options:
- A. \( a > 23x \)
- B. \( a = 23 + x \)
- C. \( a = 23x \)
- D. \( a > 13x \)
None of these options exactly match our derived result \( a > \frac{23}{x} \). However:
- If \( x > 0 \), \( \frac{23}{x} \) is greater than \( 13x \) for sufficiently small values of \( x \).
- If \( x < 0 \), \( \frac{23}{x} < 0\) could effect the inequality based on the sign of \( x \).
Therefore, we cannot definitively choose from the provided options without knowing the sign of \( x \), but \( a > 23x\) (A) could hold true for negative \( x \) values (as increasing the divisor decreases the whole ratio). If we consider that all choices must hold for \( x \ne 0 \) and find out that \( x\) could take both positive and negative values, none of those options sublimate \( a > \frac{23}{x} \) directly.
If we were to pick an answer and take into consideration the necessity for general solutions in a broad context recognizing conditions of x-values, option A seems closer primarily supporting the definition provided, otherwise effectiveness would rely on \( x\) being clearly defined.
1. We start with the original inequality:
\[
ax - 5 > 18
\]
2. Add 5 to both sides to isolate the term containing \( a \):
\[
ax > 23
\]
3. Now, divide both sides by \( x \) (assuming \( x \neq 0 \)):
\[
a > \frac{23}{x}
\]
From here, we need to see which choice corresponds to our result \( a > \frac{23}{x} \).
Given the options:
- A. \( a > 23x \)
- B. \( a = 23 + x \)
- C. \( a = 23x \)
- D. \( a > 13x \)
None of these options exactly match our derived result \( a > \frac{23}{x} \). However:
- If \( x > 0 \), \( \frac{23}{x} \) is greater than \( 13x \) for sufficiently small values of \( x \).
- If \( x < 0 \), \( \frac{23}{x} < 0\) could effect the inequality based on the sign of \( x \).
Therefore, we cannot definitively choose from the provided options without knowing the sign of \( x \), but \( a > 23x\) (A) could hold true for negative \( x \) values (as increasing the divisor decreases the whole ratio). If we consider that all choices must hold for \( x \ne 0 \) and find out that \( x\) could take both positive and negative values, none of those options sublimate \( a > \frac{23}{x} \) directly.
If we were to pick an answer and take into consideration the necessity for general solutions in a broad context recognizing conditions of x-values, option A seems closer primarily supporting the definition provided, otherwise effectiveness would rely on \( x\) being clearly defined.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.