Asked by mav welborn
Evaluate 52÷74
and simplify your answer completely.(1 point)
Responses
A 126
12 sixths
B 107
10 sevenths
C 358
35 eighths
D 99
and simplify your answer completely.(1 point)
Responses
A 126
12 sixths
B 107
10 sevenths
C 358
35 eighths
D 99
Answers
Answered by
mav welborn
WHATS THE CLOSEST
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To evaluate \( \frac{52}{74} \) and simplify it, we start by finding the greatest common divisor (GCD) of 52 and 74.
The prime factorization of 52 is:
- \( 52 = 2^2 \times 13 \)
The prime factorization of 74 is:
- \( 74 = 2 \times 37 \)
The GCD is \( 2 \).
Now we can simplify \( \frac{52}{74} \) by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their GCD:
\[
\frac{52 \div 2}{74 \div 2} = \frac{26}{37}
\]
This fraction \( \frac{26}{37} \) is already in simplest form because there are no common factors between 26 and 37 (26 is \( 2 \times 13 \) and 37 is prime).
Based on your options, none of them appear to correspond to the correct simplified fraction. If you are looking for a decimal or a specific answer format that matches your options, let me know!
The prime factorization of 52 is:
- \( 52 = 2^2 \times 13 \)
The prime factorization of 74 is:
- \( 74 = 2 \times 37 \)
The GCD is \( 2 \).
Now we can simplify \( \frac{52}{74} \) by dividing both the numerator and the denominator by their GCD:
\[
\frac{52 \div 2}{74 \div 2} = \frac{26}{37}
\]
This fraction \( \frac{26}{37} \) is already in simplest form because there are no common factors between 26 and 37 (26 is \( 2 \times 13 \) and 37 is prime).
Based on your options, none of them appear to correspond to the correct simplified fraction. If you are looking for a decimal or a specific answer format that matches your options, let me know!
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To find the closest option to the fraction \( \frac{26}{37} \), we can calculate its decimal equivalent:
\[
\frac{26}{37} \approx 0.703
\]
Next, let's examine the options provided:
A. \( 126 \), \( 12 \) sixths \( = 2 \)
B. \( 107 \), \( 10 \) sevenths \( \approx 1.4286 \)
C. \( 358 \), \( 35 \) eighths \( = 4.375 \)
D. \( 99 \), \( 9 \) ninths \( = 10 \)
Now, comparing these values to \( 0.703 \):
- None of the values are particularly close to \( \frac{26}{37} \approx 0.703 \).
However, if we want to find the closest one in terms of numerical proximity, **A (2)** would be the closest, even though none of the options are near the simplification.
If you were looking for something else, please clarify!
\[
\frac{26}{37} \approx 0.703
\]
Next, let's examine the options provided:
A. \( 126 \), \( 12 \) sixths \( = 2 \)
B. \( 107 \), \( 10 \) sevenths \( \approx 1.4286 \)
C. \( 358 \), \( 35 \) eighths \( = 4.375 \)
D. \( 99 \), \( 9 \) ninths \( = 10 \)
Now, comparing these values to \( 0.703 \):
- None of the values are particularly close to \( \frac{26}{37} \approx 0.703 \).
However, if we want to find the closest one in terms of numerical proximity, **A (2)** would be the closest, even though none of the options are near the simplification.
If you were looking for something else, please clarify!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.