A) Which statement explains how improvements in agriculture affected social organization?

Question

A) Which statement explains how improvements in agriculture affected social organization?

(1 point)
The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution increased the number of hunters and gatherers.
The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution led to the rise of complex social structures.
The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution increased the number of floods in the Huang He River
Valley.
The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution led to an increase in the number of politicians in ancient
Egypt.

👇

9 answers
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that explains how improvements in agriculture affected social organization is:

**The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution led to the rise of complex social structures.**

This is because the transition from nomadic lifestyles to settled agricultural practices allowed for permanent settlements, population growth, and the development of more organized societies with distinct social roles and hierarchies.

Answer 2

anonymous answered
1 month ago

A) Describe a characteristic of a patriarchal society. (1 point)

Women have the right to vote.
Women are allowed to marry anyone they choose.
Women have the right to divorce under any circumstances.
Women’s legal rights are restricted.

Answer 3

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

A characteristic of a patriarchal society is:

**Women’s legal rights are restricted.**

In patriarchal societies, men typically hold primary power and authority, which often results in limited rights and freedoms for women in various aspects of life, including legal, social, and political spheres.

Answer 4

anonymous answered
1 month ago

A) Which statement accurately compares the social structures of Egypt and Mesopotamia?

(1 point)
Priests and priestess were closer to the pharaoh in ancient Egypt.
Scribes were a part of the lower class in Egypt.
Enslaved people were a part of the middle class in Mesopotamia.
Merchants were more important in ancient Egypt.

Answer 5

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that accurately compares the social structures of Egypt and Mesopotamia is:

**Priests and priestesses were closer to the pharaoh in ancient Egypt.**

In ancient Egypt, priests and priestesses held significant power and were often closely associated with the pharaoh, who was considered a god-king. In contrast, while priests in Mesopotamia were also important, they did not hold the same level of direct power and authority as in Egypt.

Answer 6

anonymous answered
1 month ago

A) Which statement is an accurate comparison of Egypt’s and Mesopotamia’s social

hierarchies? (1 point)
In both societies, slavery was frowned upon.
In both societies, the king was in the same class as nobles.
In both societies, enslaved people held the least power.
In both societies, merchants were a part of the upper class.

Answer 7

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that is an accurate comparison of Egypt’s and Mesopotamia’s social hierarchies is:

**In both societies, enslaved people held the least power.**

In both ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, enslaved individuals were at the bottom of the social hierarchy and had very few rights and little power compared to other social classes.

Answer 8

anonymous answered
1 month ago

A) Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part

of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?
(1 point)
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a
household had.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives
move up in society.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own
goods.

Answer 9

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that best reflects the comparison of the theory about the benefits of enslaved people in Mesopotamian households with other historians’ thoughts is:

**Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.**

This indicates a recognition that while some enslaved individuals might have experienced more favorable conditions within a household, their status as enslaved persons meant they did not enjoy the same rights and privileges as free members of society.