To form a two-variable inequality for Kiani's spending at the bookstore, we can let \( x \) represent the number of hardbacks and \( y \) represent the number of paperbacks she buys.
Given:
- Hardbacks cost $12 each.
- Paperbacks cost $5 each.
- Kiani has a budget of $60.
The inequality representing her budget constraint is:
\[ 12x + 5y \leq 60 \]
Constraints of the problem:
- Both \( x \) and \( y \) must be non-negative since Kiani cannot buy a negative quantity of books. Thus:
- \( x \geq 0 \)
- \( y \geq 0 \)
This results in the following constraints:
- \( 12x + 5y \leq 60 \)
- \( x \geq 0 \)
- \( y \geq 0 \)
Now, we'll evaluate the given points to determine which one represents a viable solution that satisfies all the constraints:
-
(1, 4.5):
- \( 12(1) + 5(4.5) = 12 + 22.5 = 34.5 \) (This is within the budget.)
- \( x \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \) are satisfied.
- Viable solution.
-
(6, 6):
- \( 12(6) + 5(6) = 72 + 30 = 102 \) (This exceeds the budget.)
- Not a viable solution.
-
(−2, 6):
- Negative quantity of hardbacks (not possible).
- Not a viable solution.
-
(2, 4):
- \( 12(2) + 5(4) = 24 + 20 = 44 \) (This is within the budget.)
- \( x \geq 0 \) and \( y \geq 0 \) are satisfied.
- Viable solution.
Conclusion: The points that are viable solutions based on the given conditions are (1, 4.5) and (2, 4).
Therefore, the answer is:
- (1, 4.5) or (2, 4) represents a viable solution.