Ask a New Question
Menu

Claim: Supreme Court justices shouldn't serve for life. Which of the following is NOT a good piece of evidence to support this claim?

*
1 point
A, The failing health of aging Supreme Court justices could influence their decisions.
B, Older Supreme Court justices might not be able to keep up with the rapid changing of culture and technology.
C, Because Supreme Court justices serve for life, they don't have to worry about political pressures of making decisions based on keeping their jobs.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

C, Because Supreme Court justices serve for life, they don't have to worry about political pressures of making decisions based on keeping their jobs.

This piece of evidence does not support the claim that Supreme Court justices shouldn't serve for life. In fact, it suggests a positive aspect of lifetime tenure, indicating that it allows justices to make decisions without political pressure. The other two options point out potential issues related to aging justices and their ability to adapt to contemporary societal changes, which are more relevant to the argument against lifetime tenure.