Asked by meli
Complete the equation to create an equation with No Solution. 5(3x - 4) = 4 + Choose... x
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To create an equation with no solution, we want to have a scenario where the left-hand side and the right-hand side are equal, but they represent different constants when simplified.
Let's simplify the left side first:
\( 5(3x - 4) = 15x - 20 \)
Now we need to choose an expression for the right side that would lead to a contradiction. For instance, we could set the right side as something that contradicts when simplified.
One possibility could be:
\( 4 + 3x \)
Thus, the complete equation would be:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 4 + 3x \]
Now, let's see if this has no solution:
1. Simplify both sides:
- Left side: \( 15x - 20 \)
- Right side: \( 3x + 4 \)
2. Set them equal:
\[ 15x - 20 = 3x + 4 \]
3. Subtract \( 3x \) from both sides:
\[ 12x - 20 = 4 \]
4. Add 20 to both sides:
\[ 12x = 24 \]
5. Divide by 12:
\[ x = 2 \]
Now, if we make a slight adjustment to the right-hand side, such as changing it to \( 4 + 4x \) or any other constant that would eventually yield a differing constant, we could generate a no-solution situation:
So, if we choose:
\[ 4 + 12 \] (which simplifies to 16)
Then we have:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 16 \]
Solving this:
1. \( 15x - 20 = 16 \)
2. Then, add 20:
- \( 15x = 36 \)
3. Divide by 15:
- \( x = \frac{36}{15} \)
Since it ends up with a solution. We need to choose the right condition.
A solution producing a true contradiction could simply be to set it as:
\[ 4 + 5 = 5 + 3x \]
If you try that, you get:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 5 \]
Thus, collecting terms this way would generate no solution overall.
In conclusion, changing the right-hand side to \( 5 + 3x \) provides a suitable contradiction ending with an equation such as:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 5 + 3x \]
And upon resolution simplifies to a contradiction, creating an equation with no solution.
Let's simplify the left side first:
\( 5(3x - 4) = 15x - 20 \)
Now we need to choose an expression for the right side that would lead to a contradiction. For instance, we could set the right side as something that contradicts when simplified.
One possibility could be:
\( 4 + 3x \)
Thus, the complete equation would be:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 4 + 3x \]
Now, let's see if this has no solution:
1. Simplify both sides:
- Left side: \( 15x - 20 \)
- Right side: \( 3x + 4 \)
2. Set them equal:
\[ 15x - 20 = 3x + 4 \]
3. Subtract \( 3x \) from both sides:
\[ 12x - 20 = 4 \]
4. Add 20 to both sides:
\[ 12x = 24 \]
5. Divide by 12:
\[ x = 2 \]
Now, if we make a slight adjustment to the right-hand side, such as changing it to \( 4 + 4x \) or any other constant that would eventually yield a differing constant, we could generate a no-solution situation:
So, if we choose:
\[ 4 + 12 \] (which simplifies to 16)
Then we have:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 16 \]
Solving this:
1. \( 15x - 20 = 16 \)
2. Then, add 20:
- \( 15x = 36 \)
3. Divide by 15:
- \( x = \frac{36}{15} \)
Since it ends up with a solution. We need to choose the right condition.
A solution producing a true contradiction could simply be to set it as:
\[ 4 + 5 = 5 + 3x \]
If you try that, you get:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 5 \]
Thus, collecting terms this way would generate no solution overall.
In conclusion, changing the right-hand side to \( 5 + 3x \) provides a suitable contradiction ending with an equation such as:
\[ 5(3x - 4) = 5 + 3x \]
And upon resolution simplifies to a contradiction, creating an equation with no solution.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!