Question
i am going to give u a passage and questions
Answers
Answer
Use the article to answer the question. Which section provides the most evidence supporting the need for new, improved biodegradable plastics? (1 point) Responses “How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name” “How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name” “What the researchers did” “What the researchers did” “What the scientists found” “What the scientists found” “Why it matters”
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Sure! Please provide the passage and the questions, and I'll be happy to help you with them.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To determine which section provides the most evidence supporting the need for new, improved biodegradable plastics, we can analyze the typical content of each section:
1. **“How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name”** - This likely discusses the shortcomings of current biodegradable plastics, which could provide evidence of the need for improvements.
2. **“What the researchers did”** - This section typically summarizes the methodology and experiments conducted, which may not directly address the need for better options.
3. **“What the scientists found”** - This part usually presents the results of the research, which might indicate issues with current biodegradable plastics and emphasize the need for better alternatives.
4. **“Why it matters”** - This section often discusses the implications of the research findings and the importance of addressing the issues identified, which could also support the need for new solutions.
Given this analysis, the section titled **“How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name”** likely provides the most direct evidence supporting the need for new, improved biodegradable plastics, as it focuses on the failures of the current materials.
1. **“How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name”** - This likely discusses the shortcomings of current biodegradable plastics, which could provide evidence of the need for improvements.
2. **“What the researchers did”** - This section typically summarizes the methodology and experiments conducted, which may not directly address the need for better options.
3. **“What the scientists found”** - This part usually presents the results of the research, which might indicate issues with current biodegradable plastics and emphasize the need for better alternatives.
4. **“Why it matters”** - This section often discusses the implications of the research findings and the importance of addressing the issues identified, which could also support the need for new solutions.
Given this analysis, the section titled **“How biodegradable plastic bags don’t live up to their name”** likely provides the most direct evidence supporting the need for new, improved biodegradable plastics, as it focuses on the failures of the current materials.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.