Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
Put the steps to the proof that the sum t = r + s is irrational if r is a rational and s is a rational in the correct sequenceQuestion
Put the steps to the proof that the sum t=r+s is irrational if r is a rational and s is irrational in the correct sequence
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To prove that the sum \( t = r + s \) is irrational when \( r \) is rational and \( s \) is irrational, you can follow these steps in the correct sequence:
1. **Assume \( r \) is rational**: By definition, this means that \( r \) can be expressed as \( \frac{a}{b} \), where \( a \) and \( b \) are integers and \( b \neq 0 \).
2. **Assume \( s \) is irrational**: This means that \( s \) cannot be expressed as a fraction of integers; it does not equal \( \frac{c}{d} \) for any integers \( c \) and \( d \).
3. **Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that \( t = r + s \) is rational**: This means \( t \) can also be expressed as \( \frac{m}{n} \), where \( m \) and \( n \) are integers and \( n \neq 0 \).
4. **Rearrange the equation**: From the assumption, we can write:
\[
s = t - r
\]
5. **Substitute the expressions**: Substitute \( t \) and \( r \) with their respective forms:
\[
s = \frac{m}{n} - \frac{a}{b}
\]
To combine these fractions, find a common denominator:
\[
s = \frac{mb - a n}{nb}
\]
6. **Analyze the expression**: Since \( mb \), \( a \), \( n \), and \( b \) are integers, the result of \(\frac{mb - an}{nb}\) is a fraction of two integers, which makes \( s \) rational.
7. **Reach a contradiction**: This contradicts our earlier assumption that \( s \) is irrational.
8. **Conclude that \( t = r + s \) must be irrational**: Since assuming \( t \) is rational leads to a contradiction, we conclude that \( t \) must be irrational.
By following these steps in order, you've successfully demonstrated that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.
1. **Assume \( r \) is rational**: By definition, this means that \( r \) can be expressed as \( \frac{a}{b} \), where \( a \) and \( b \) are integers and \( b \neq 0 \).
2. **Assume \( s \) is irrational**: This means that \( s \) cannot be expressed as a fraction of integers; it does not equal \( \frac{c}{d} \) for any integers \( c \) and \( d \).
3. **Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that \( t = r + s \) is rational**: This means \( t \) can also be expressed as \( \frac{m}{n} \), where \( m \) and \( n \) are integers and \( n \neq 0 \).
4. **Rearrange the equation**: From the assumption, we can write:
\[
s = t - r
\]
5. **Substitute the expressions**: Substitute \( t \) and \( r \) with their respective forms:
\[
s = \frac{m}{n} - \frac{a}{b}
\]
To combine these fractions, find a common denominator:
\[
s = \frac{mb - a n}{nb}
\]
6. **Analyze the expression**: Since \( mb \), \( a \), \( n \), and \( b \) are integers, the result of \(\frac{mb - an}{nb}\) is a fraction of two integers, which makes \( s \) rational.
7. **Reach a contradiction**: This contradicts our earlier assumption that \( s \) is irrational.
8. **Conclude that \( t = r + s \) must be irrational**: Since assuming \( t \) is rational leads to a contradiction, we conclude that \( t \) must be irrational.
By following these steps in order, you've successfully demonstrated that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is irrational.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.