Ask a New Question
Menu

Which statement best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic?(1 point)

Responses

The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.
The consuls of the Roman Republic dictated the agenda of the Tribal Assembly whereas the Athenian democracy was decided by the Council of 500.

The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.
The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.

The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.
The Athenian Council of 500 was responsible for military decisions whereas the Roman Republic did not have a specific body designated for military actions.

The Athenian polis was ruled by a monarch whereas the Roman Republic used two consuls.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that best explains the differences between the democracy of the Athenian polis and the structure of the Roman Republic is:

**The senate of the Roman Republic was composed of wealthy patrician magistrates whereas the Athenian ecclesia and Council of 500 were made up of various citizens drawn by lot from different territories within Athens.**

This statement effectively highlights the differences in social class representation and the mechanisms of governance in both systems, emphasizing the oligarchic elements of the Roman Republic in contrast to the more democratic elements of Athenian governance.

anonymous anonymous answered
1 month ago

Which statement best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic?(1 point)

Responses

The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic.
The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic.

The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.
The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.

The Roman Republic had three classes of citizens: the elites, plebeians, and patricians. The Mayan civilization only had two: upper class and lower class.
The Roman Republic had three classes of citizens: the elites, plebeians, and patricians. The Mayan civilization only had two: upper class and lower class.

The Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly that dealt solely with civilian affairs.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic is:

**The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate.**

This statement highlights the structural differences between the two civilizations, emphasizing the decentralization and independence of Mayan city-states in contrast to the more centralized and organized political system of the Roman Republic.

anonymous anonymous answered
1 month ago

Use the table to answer the question.

Event/System Description
First Triumvirate Alliance formed among Julius Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey for political reasons to end the deadlock between the Populares and Optimates
First Civil War War between Julius Caesar and Pompey for the dictatorship of Rome
Second Civil War War between Antony and Octavian for what would eventually become the Roman EmpireWhich statement accurately summarizes the figures and events that led to the fall of the Roman Republic?(1 point)
Responses

The Roman Republic fell due to the first civil war and political struggles between the Populares and plebeians.
The Roman Republic fell due to the first civil war and political struggles between the Populares and plebeians.

The Roman Republic fell due to the Second Triumvirate and the political struggles between the consuls and Optimates.
The Roman Republic fell due to the Second Triumvirate and the political struggles between the consuls and Optimates.

The Roman Republic fell due to the first civil war and political struggles between the Populares and Optimates.
The Roman Republic fell due to the first civil war and political struggles between the Populares and Optimates.

The Roman Republic fell due to the second civil war and political struggles between the Populares and Optimates.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that accurately summarizes the figures and events that led to the fall of the Roman Republic is:

**The Roman Republic fell due to the first civil war and political struggles between the Populares and Optimates.**

This statement captures the key conflict between these two political factions and the significance of the first civil war (between Julius Caesar and Pompey) in the context of the Republic's decline.

anonymous anonymous answered
1 month ago

Which statement summarizes how the Roman Empire formed?(1 point)

Responses

The Roman Empire formed due to the march over the Rubicon river, which made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.
The Roman Empire formed due to the march over the Rubicon river, which made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.

The Roman Empire formed due to the first civil war and the death of Caesar, which made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.
The Roman Empire formed due to the first civil war and the death of Caesar, which made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.

The Roman Empire formed due to the conflict among the First Triumvirate that made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.
The Roman Empire formed due to the conflict among the First Triumvirate that made Octavian the first emperor of Rome.

The Roman Empire formed when Octavian defeated Antony at the Battle of Actium, making Octavian the first emperor of Rome.

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The statement that best summarizes how the Roman Empire formed is:

**The Roman Empire formed when Octavian defeated Antony at the Battle of Actium, making Octavian the first emperor of Rome.**

This statement accurately captures the pivotal event that led to Octavian's rise to power and the establishment of the imperial system in Rome.

anonymous anonymous answered
1 month ago

How would you construct a timeline of significant events that led up to the formation of the Roman Empire, listing the events in chronological order?(1 point)

Responses

Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, Sulla’s march on Rome, First Triumvirate, march across the Rubicon, Ides of March, Second Triumvirate, Battle of Actium
Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, Sulla’s march on Rome, First Triumvirate, march across the Rubicon, Ides of March, Second Triumvirate, Battle of Actium

Ides of March, Battle of Actium, march across the Rubicon, Sulla’s march on Rome, Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, First Triumvirate, Second Triumvirate
Ides of March, Battle of Actium, march across the Rubicon, Sulla’s march on Rome, Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, First Triumvirate, Second Triumvirate

march across the Rubicon, Battle of Actium, Ides of March, Sulla’s march on Rome, Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, Second Triumvirate, First Triumvirate
march across the Rubicon, Battle of Actium, Ides of March, Sulla’s march on Rome, Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, Second Triumvirate, First Triumvirate

Battle of Actium, Ides of March, march across the Rubicon, Second Triumvirate, First Triumvirate, Sulla’s march on Rome, Gracchi brothers’ assassinations

User Icon for Bot GPT 4-o mini Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The correct chronological order of significant events that led up to the formation of the Roman Empire is:

**Gracchi brothers’ assassinations, Sulla’s march on Rome, First Triumvirate, march across the Rubicon, Ides of March, Second Triumvirate, Battle of Actium.**

This sequence accurately reflects the progression of events that contributed to the transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire.