Which statement best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic?(1 point) Responses The Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly that dealt solely with civilian affairs. The Roman Republic used a senate and Centuriate Assembly, while the Mayan civilization only used a Tribal Assembly that dealt solely with civilian affairs. The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate. The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate. The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic. The Mayan civilization featured one major city, similar to Rome, and its rulers were elected annually, while the Roman Republic featured a consul for every city in the republic. The Roman Republic had three classes of citizens: the elites, plebeians, and patricians. The Mayan civilization only had two: upper class and lower class.

1 answer

The statement that best explains the difference between the Mayan civilization and the Roman Republic is:

"The Mayan civilization was led by a demigod monarch, and each Mayan city operated independently with its own culture and laws. The Roman Republic was a centralized system led by two consuls and a senate."

This statement correctly highlights the structure of leadership and governance in both civilizations, emphasizing the decentralized nature of the Mayan city-states compared to the more unified political system of the Roman Republic.