The main difference between the Committees of Correspondence and the Sons of Liberty lies in their methods and organizational structure. The Committees of Correspondence functioned as public, diplomatic bodies that aimed to coordinate communication and rally support among the colonies against British policies. They were official in nature, involving discussions, correspondence, and a focus on creating political unity among the colonies.
In contrast, the Sons of Liberty operated as a secretive and more radical group. They engaged in direct action, including intimidation and physical demonstrations, to oppose British authority. Their methods were forceful and often involved acts of civil disobedience, such as the Boston Tea Party.
In summary, while both groups were dedicated to opposing British rule and advocating for colonial interests, the Committees of Correspondence worked through formal communication and organization to foster political unity, whereas the Sons of Liberty executed more confrontational and sometimes violent strategies.