Using a lens of historical empathy, which of the following tables depicts a historical perspective that differs from today and describes the process Alexander the Great used to build the Macedonian Empire?

To analyze the process Alexander the Great used to build the Macedonian Empire through a lens of historical empathy, it's important to recognize the values, motivations, and contextual factors of his time, which can differ significantly from contemporary perspectives.

In evaluating different tables or descriptions of Alexander's methods, look for elements that reflect:

1. **Cultural Integration**: Alexander often combined the practices of the cultures he conquered with Hellenistic culture. A historical perspective might emphasize his efforts to integrate local customs and administrators rather than purely impose Macedonian rule, which may contrast with modern perspectives that often view imperialism through a critical lens focused on domination and exploitation.

2. **Military Strategy**: Alexander's military tactics and strategies might be portrayed in terms of brilliance and innovation, focusing on the importance of warfare as a means of state-building. This contrasts with modern views that may emphasize the human cost of war and question the ethics of military expansion.

3. **Leadership Style**: His approach as a leader may be reflected differently, highlighting the respect he gained from his troops and his attempts to present himself as a god or semi-divine figure in the eyes of both Macedonians and Persians. This perspective might be perceived as a means of legitimizing his rule, which could be viewed through varied lenses today—some might see it as clever manipulation, while others could recognize the psychological needs of leadership at the time.

4. **Political Alliances**: The diplomatic relationships he cultivated, such as marriages to local princesses or treaties forged with defeated enemies, are often key to understanding his empire-building process. A historical perspective may highlight the practicality and necessity of these alliances, compared to modern critiques of political arrangements that often focus on ethics and power dynamics.

5. **Religious Justifications**: Alexander often related his conquests to divine will or destiny, which was a common belief in his time. This may be contrasted with modern secular views that place a higher emphasis on temporal rather than spiritual justification for expansion.

In summary, a table that emphasizes the complex interplay of military prowess, cultural blending, political astuteness, and religious context will illustrate a nuanced historical perspective of Alexander the Great that contrasts with contemporary views grounded in modern ethical considerations and philosophies of governance.