Which was a significant reason Middle Colonies were more favorable to farmers than New England? SELECT THE TWO THAT APPLY(4 points)

Responses

The climate was cooler
The climate was cooler

Crops grew better along the coast
Crops grew better along the coast

The soil was more fertile
The soil was more fertile

There were more people to tend the farms
There were more people to tend the farms

The growing season was longer
The growing season was longer

11 answers

The two significant reasons that made the Middle Colonies more favorable to farmers than New England are:

  1. The soil was more fertile - The Middle Colonies had richer, more productive soils that were conducive to farming.
  2. The growing season was longer - The climate in the Middle Colonies allowed for a longer growing season compared to New England, which benefited agricultural production.

These two factors contributed significantly to the agricultural success of the Middle Colonies.

What was the INITIAL (FIRST) reason many European explorers sailed to the Americas?(1 point)
Responses

To form military alliances

To find new trade routes to Asia

To find new sources of cheap labor

To spread Christianity to Africa

The INITIAL (FIRST) reason many European explorers sailed to the Americas was to find new trade routes to Asia. This quest was primarily motivated by the desire to access valuable spices, silk, and other goods that were highly sought after in Europe.

Why is the Mayflower Compact significant?(1 point)
Responses

It was first written document forbidding colonists from voting directly on laws.

It was the first written document that did not recognize citizens' rights

It was the first written expression of citizens' rights by the colonists

It was the first written government document NOT created by the colonists

The Mayflower Compact is significant because it was the first written expression of citizens' rights by the colonists. It established a framework for self-governance in the New World and laid the foundation for democratic principles in America.

What was the primary (MAIN) reason the Pilgrims came to the New World?(1 point)
Responses

religious freedom

land

ship building

trade with Native Americans

The primary (MAIN) reason the Pilgrims came to the New World was religious freedom. They sought to escape religious persecution in England and establish a community where they could practice their beliefs freely.

What was the primary (MAIN) reason Thomas Hooker left the Massachusetts Bay colony and founded the Connecticut colony?(1 point)
Responses

His religious ideals conflicted with the Puritan beliefs

He was forced out by Native Americans

He thought the government had too much power

He desired to move further inland where soil was better for farming

The primary (MAIN) reason Thomas Hooker left the Massachusetts Bay Colony and founded the Connecticut Colony was his religious ideals conflicted with the Puritan beliefs. Hooker advocated for more religious and political freedom, which led him to establish a new colony that aligned more closely with his values.

How was the government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) different from the government in Massachusetts? SELECT TWO THAT APPLY.(4 points)
Responses

The FOC increased the control the King of England had on the colony.

The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.

The FOC limited the governor's power which expanded the idea of representative government.

The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.

The two ways in which the government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) differed from the government in Massachusetts are:

  1. The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners. - This was a more inclusive approach to voting than that of Massachusetts, which had more restrictive voting requirements.

  2. The FOC limited the governor's power which expanded the idea of representative government. - The Fundamental Orders established a government that had a clearer separation of powers and limited the authority of the governor, promoting a more representative form of governance compared to the more centralized authority seen in Massachusetts.