Question

Which option best describes why multiple scales would be useful for analyzing voting patterns within a state?(1 point)
Responses

A small-scale map could show voting trends in urban and rural areas, while a large-scale map could show differences between major cities.
A small-scale map could show voting trends in urban and rural areas, while a large-scale map could show differences between major cities.

A large-scale map could help you compare voting patterns in different counties, while a small-scale map could show variations within neighborhoods.
A large-scale map could help you compare voting patterns in different counties, while a small-scale map could show variations within neighborhoods.

A large-scale map could show the voting tendencies of counties, while a small-scale map could show the distribution of those demographics across the state.
A large-scale map could show the voting tendencies of counties, while a small-scale map could show the distribution of those demographics across the state.

A small-scale map could show general trends across the state, while a large-scale map could show patterns in voting within particular cities.
A small-scale map could show general trends across the state, while a large-scale map could show patterns in voting within particular cities.

Answer 1

The option that best describes why multiple scales would be useful for analyzing voting patterns within a state is:

**A small-scale map could show general trends across the state, while a large-scale map could show patterns in voting within particular cities.**

This option effectively highlights the advantage of using different scales to capture both broader state-level trends and more detailed local patterns, which is essential for a comprehensive analysis of voting behavior.