Asked by x
Which would be considered a reliable source?(1 point)
Responses
an article from a scientific journal
an article from a scientific journal
a blog written by an anonymous author
a blog written by an anonymous author
a biology textbook from 1920
a biology textbook from 1920
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
Responses
an article from a scientific journal
an article from a scientific journal
a blog written by an anonymous author
a blog written by an anonymous author
a biology textbook from 1920
a biology textbook from 1920
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
Answers
Answered by
x
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
Responses
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
Answered by
x
Which question can be used to evaluate reliability of a source?(1 point)
Responses
"Is the author American?"
"Is the author American?"
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
Responses
"Is the author American?"
"Is the author American?"
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
Answered by
x
Validity refers to(1 point)
Responses
originality.
originality.
reliability.
reliability.
accuracy.
accuracy.
consistency.
consistency.
Responses
originality.
originality.
reliability.
reliability.
accuracy.
accuracy.
consistency.
consistency.
Answered by
x
To corroborate information is to(1 point)
Responses
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
Responses
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
An article from a scientific journal would be considered a reliable source.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The statement that illustrates bias in scientific research is:
**An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.**
This suggests a potential conflict of interest and bias due to the funding source influencing the research outcomes.
**An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.**
This suggests a potential conflict of interest and bias due to the funding source influencing the research outcomes.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
The question that can be used to evaluate the reliability of a source is:
**“Is the research peer-reviewed?"**
Peer-reviewed research is generally considered more reliable as it has been evaluated by experts in the field before publication.
**“Is the research peer-reviewed?"**
Peer-reviewed research is generally considered more reliable as it has been evaluated by experts in the field before publication.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Validity refers to **accuracy.** It indicates whether a study or measure actually assesses what it is intended to assess.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To corroborate information is to **find evidence that supports a scientific position.**
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.