To compare the functions \( f(x) = 2\sqrt{x} \) and \( g(x) = 2\sqrt[3]{x} \), we can analyze the characteristics of both functions.
1. **Domains**:
- The domain of \( f(x) = 2\sqrt{x} \) is \( x \geq 0 \) because the square root function is only defined for non-negative values.
- The domain of \( g(x) = 2\sqrt[3]{x} \) is all real numbers \( (-\infty, \infty) \) because the cube root function is defined for all real numbers.
Therefore, **the graphs have different domains**.
2. **Behavior of the Functions**:
- The function \( f(x) = 2\sqrt{x} \) is increasing for \( x \geq 0 \).
- The function \( g(x) = 2\sqrt[3]{x} \) is also increasing for all \( x \).
Thus, **they are not decreasing on their domains**.
3. **Points**:
- Checking the points:
- \( f(-1) \) is not defined.
- \( f(0) = 0 \)
- \( f(1) = 2\sqrt{1} = 2 \)
- For \( g(x) \):
- \( g(-1) = 2\sqrt[3]{-1} = -2 \)
- \( g(0) = 0 \)
- \( g(1) = 2\sqrt[3]{1} = 2 \)
This shows that neither function goes through \((-1, -1)\), and they do not match at that point, while they both pass through \((0, 0)\) and \((1, 2)\).
4. **Comparison for \( x > 1 \)**:
- For \( x > 1 \), since \( \sqrt[3]{x} < \sqrt{x} \) for \( x > 1 \) (because the square root grows faster than the cube root), it follows that \( g(x) < f(x) \) for \( x > 1 \).
Therefore, the correct statements based on this analysis are:
- The graphs have different domains.
- They are both increasing on their domains.
- Both functions do not go through \((-1, -1)\) and indeed misrepresent the intersection point accusations.
Thus, among the options you've provided, the most fitting response would be:
**The graphs have different domains.**