To determine which function, \( g \) or \( h \), is the inverse of function \( f \), we need to identify if for every point \( (x, y) \) on the graph of \( f \), there is a corresponding point \( (y, x) \) on the graph of \( g \) or \( h \).
Given the points on each function:
- Function \( f \) has points \( (0, 1) \), \( (1, 3) \), and \( (3, 5) \).
- Function \( g \) has points \( (0, 1) \), \( (1, 3) \), and \( (3, 5) \).
- Function \( h \) has points \( (1, 0) \), \( (3, 1) \), and \( (5, 3) \).
Let's check for inverse relationships:
-
For Function \( g \):
- Point \( (0, 1) \): Corresponding point in \( g \) is \( (1, 0) \) → Not a match.
- Point \( (1, 3) \): Corresponding point in \( g \) is \( (3, 1) \) → Not a match.
- Point \( (3, 5) \): Corresponding point in \( g \) is \( (5, 3) \) → Not a match.
Overall, \( g \) does not correspond to the points of \( f \) in an inverse relationship.
-
For Function \( h \):
- Point \( (0, 1) \): Corresponding point in \( h \) is \( (1, 0) \).
- Point \( (1, 3) \): This point does not appear in \( h \).
- Point \( (3, 5) \): This point does not appear in \( h \).
It appears that \( h \) does not cover all the points from \( f \) either.
After assessing \( g \) and \( h \), the actual matching pairs are seen when checking established inverses, confirming \( g \) does have inverse points \( (3, 1) \) and \( (5, 3) \).
Thus, the correct answer is:
The function g is the inverse because for every point \( (a, b) \) on the graph of \( f \), there is a corresponding point \( (b, a) \) on the graph of g.