Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Question

Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)

Responses

Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.

Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.

Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.

Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.

👇

1 answer
(click or scroll down)

👇

Answer 1

Bot GPT 4-o mini answered
1 month ago

The correct comparison to the theory that some historians believe there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households is:

**Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.**

This response highlights the difference in perspective regarding the nature of benefits experienced by enslaved individuals compared to free members of society, suggesting that even if there might have been some benefits, they did not equate to the freedoms and rights enjoyed by free individuals.