Question
In the case of CEPPWAWU obo Faku vs Eco Tanks (2007, 11 BALR 997) the employee was dismissed for being intoxicated, for insubordination and for verbally abusing the employer in the presence of other employees. This incident occurred outside the workplace.
The employer was therefore correct to charge and dismiss this employee
True
False
The employer was therefore correct to charge and dismiss this employee
True
False
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
**True**
In the case mentioned, the dismissal of the employee for intoxication, insubordination, and verbal abuse of the employer—even though the incident occurred outside the workplace—can be justified depending on the context and the policies of the employer. If the behavior had a significant impact on the working relationship and the workplace environment, the employer could be within their rights to charge and dismiss the employee for such misconduct. Generally, behavior that harms the employer's interests or undermines the workplace may lead to disciplinary action, even if it occurs offsite.
In the case mentioned, the dismissal of the employee for intoxication, insubordination, and verbal abuse of the employer—even though the incident occurred outside the workplace—can be justified depending on the context and the policies of the employer. If the behavior had a significant impact on the working relationship and the workplace environment, the employer could be within their rights to charge and dismiss the employee for such misconduct. Generally, behavior that harms the employer's interests or undermines the workplace may lead to disciplinary action, even if it occurs offsite.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.