Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
The Celsius to Fahrenheit formula: F=9/5C+32 Solve this formula for C. Check all answers that are true. (4 points) Responses Fi...Asked by I_EAT_EVERYDAY
The Celsius to Fahrenheit formula: F = 9 over 5C + 32
Solve this formula for C. Check ALL!!! Answers that are TRUE!!..
options:
A). First step is to multiply by 9 on each side.
B). First step is to add 32 to both sides.
C). The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to multiply both sides by 5
D). The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to divide both sides by 5
E). Solution: 5/9F - 32 = C
F). To solve this equation for C, you would have to distribute at some point.
Solve this formula for C. Check ALL!!! Answers that are TRUE!!..
options:
A). First step is to multiply by 9 on each side.
B). First step is to add 32 to both sides.
C). The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to multiply both sides by 5
D). The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to divide both sides by 5
E). Solution: 5/9F - 32 = C
F). To solve this equation for C, you would have to distribute at some point.
Answers
Answered by
I_EAT_EVERYDAY
Izzie is trying to solve this inequality: 3(t + 1) − 4t ≥ −5
After she solves it, she shows it to you and asks you if she did it correctly.
This is the work she completed:
Step 1: 3t + 3 − 4t ≥ −5
Step 2: −t + 3 ≥ −5
Step 3: −t ≥ −2
Step 4: t ≤ 2
options:
1. Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality. True or false?
2. The correct answer should have been t≤8. True or false?
3. Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4. True or false?
4. Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2. True or false?
5. Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥ to ≤
True or false?
6. Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3 True or false?
After she solves it, she shows it to you and asks you if she did it correctly.
This is the work she completed:
Step 1: 3t + 3 − 4t ≥ −5
Step 2: −t + 3 ≥ −5
Step 3: −t ≥ −2
Step 4: t ≤ 2
options:
1. Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality. True or false?
2. The correct answer should have been t≤8. True or false?
3. Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4. True or false?
4. Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2. True or false?
5. Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥ to ≤
True or false?
6. Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3 True or false?
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To solve the equation \( F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32 \) for \( C \), let's go through it step by step and evaluate the options provided.
1. Start with the original equation:
\[
F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32
\]
2. Subtract 32 from both sides:
\[
F - 32 = \frac{9}{5}C
\]
3. To isolate \( C \), you can multiply both sides by \( \frac{5}{9} \):
\[
C = \frac{5}{9}(F - 32)
\]
Now let's check each option.
A). **First step is to multiply by 9 on each side.**
- FALSE. The first step to isolate C is to subtract 32 from both sides, not multiply by 9.
B). **First step is to add 32 to both sides.**
- FALSE. The first step is to subtract 32 from both sides, not add.
C). **The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to multiply both sides by 5.**
- TRUE. You could multiply both sides by 5, but you need to divide by 9 afterwards to isolate C, this step is valid.
D). **The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to divide both sides by 5.**
- FALSE. Dividing both sides by 5 would not isolate C, you need to multiply first.
E). **Solution: 5/9F - 32 = C**
- FALSE. The correct solution is \( C = \frac{5}{9}(F - 32) \) or equivalently \( C = \frac{5}{9}F - \frac{160}{9} \) after distributing.
F). **To solve this equation for C, you would have to distribute at some point.**
- TRUE. You would distribute when rearranging to get to the final solution.
**Summary:**
- Options C and F are TRUE.
- Options A, B, D, and E are FALSE.
1. Start with the original equation:
\[
F = \frac{9}{5}C + 32
\]
2. Subtract 32 from both sides:
\[
F - 32 = \frac{9}{5}C
\]
3. To isolate \( C \), you can multiply both sides by \( \frac{5}{9} \):
\[
C = \frac{5}{9}(F - 32)
\]
Now let's check each option.
A). **First step is to multiply by 9 on each side.**
- FALSE. The first step to isolate C is to subtract 32 from both sides, not multiply by 9.
B). **First step is to add 32 to both sides.**
- FALSE. The first step is to subtract 32 from both sides, not add.
C). **The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to multiply both sides by 5.**
- TRUE. You could multiply both sides by 5, but you need to divide by 9 afterwards to isolate C, this step is valid.
D). **The next step from F - 32 = 9/5 C, could be to divide both sides by 5.**
- FALSE. Dividing both sides by 5 would not isolate C, you need to multiply first.
E). **Solution: 5/9F - 32 = C**
- FALSE. The correct solution is \( C = \frac{5}{9}(F - 32) \) or equivalently \( C = \frac{5}{9}F - \frac{160}{9} \) after distributing.
F). **To solve this equation for C, you would have to distribute at some point.**
- TRUE. You would distribute when rearranging to get to the final solution.
**Summary:**
- Options C and F are TRUE.
- Options A, B, D, and E are FALSE.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
Let's carefully go through Izzie's work on the inequality and evaluate her solution step by step.
Starting with the inequality:
\[
3(t + 1) - 4t \geq -5
\]
**Step-by-step work**
1. Distributing \(3\) in the first term:
\[
3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5
\]
This is correct as shown in Step 1.
2. Combining like terms:
\[
(3t - 4t) + 3 \geq -5 \implies -t + 3 \geq -5
\]
This is also correct as shown in Step 2.
3. Now, subtract \(3\) from both sides:
\[
-t \geq -5 - 3 \implies -t \geq -8
\]
So, at this point, we have:
\[
-t \geq -8
\]
4. Now, to isolate \(t\), we multiply both sides by \(-1\) and remember to flip the inequality:
\[
t \leq 8
\]
So the correct solution to the inequality is:
\[
t \leq 8
\]
Now, let's check Izzie's steps against the correct solution:
1. **Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality.**
- **False.** She concluded with \(t \leq 2\), but the correct answer is \(t \leq 8\).
2. **The correct answer should have been \(t \leq 8\).**
- **True.** As derived above.
3. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4.**
- **True.** She incorrectly concluded with \(t \leq 2\) instead of the correct conclusion \(t \leq 8\).
4. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2.**
- **False.** Her work from step 1 to step 2 was correct.
5. **Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥ to ≤.**
- **True.** Because when multiplying/dividing by a negative number (in step 3), the inequality direction must flip.
6. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3.**
- **False.** The transition from step 2 to step 3 was correct; she just miscalculated the next step.
**Summary of answers:**
1. False
2. True
3. True
4. False
5. True
6. False
Starting with the inequality:
\[
3(t + 1) - 4t \geq -5
\]
**Step-by-step work**
1. Distributing \(3\) in the first term:
\[
3t + 3 - 4t \geq -5
\]
This is correct as shown in Step 1.
2. Combining like terms:
\[
(3t - 4t) + 3 \geq -5 \implies -t + 3 \geq -5
\]
This is also correct as shown in Step 2.
3. Now, subtract \(3\) from both sides:
\[
-t \geq -5 - 3 \implies -t \geq -8
\]
So, at this point, we have:
\[
-t \geq -8
\]
4. Now, to isolate \(t\), we multiply both sides by \(-1\) and remember to flip the inequality:
\[
t \leq 8
\]
So the correct solution to the inequality is:
\[
t \leq 8
\]
Now, let's check Izzie's steps against the correct solution:
1. **Izzie made no mistakes in solving this inequality.**
- **False.** She concluded with \(t \leq 2\), but the correct answer is \(t \leq 8\).
2. **The correct answer should have been \(t \leq 8\).**
- **True.** As derived above.
3. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 3 to step 4.**
- **True.** She incorrectly concluded with \(t \leq 2\) instead of the correct conclusion \(t \leq 8\).
4. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 1 to step 2.**
- **False.** Her work from step 1 to step 2 was correct.
5. **Izzie should not have changed the inequality symbol from ≥ to ≤.**
- **True.** Because when multiplying/dividing by a negative number (in step 3), the inequality direction must flip.
6. **Izzie made a mistake going from step 2 to step 3.**
- **False.** The transition from step 2 to step 3 was correct; she just miscalculated the next step.
**Summary of answers:**
1. False
2. True
3. True
4. False
5. True
6. False
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.