Which of the following is an accurate discussion of why a bill of rights for the national government might not be necessary? (1 point)

Question

• The national government has only delegated powers.
• A lengthy list of rights were already protected by the Constitution.
• A lengthy list of rights were already protected by each state.
• The national government has only reserved powers.

Answer 1

The most accurate discussion of why a bill of rights for the national government might not be necessary is:

The national government has only delegated powers.

This argument is based on the idea that the national government is limited to the powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution, and therefore it should not have the authority to infringe upon individual rights that are not within those delegated powers.