Which statement best analyzes the significance of the gerrymandering method of cracking and its impact on effective representation? (1 point)

Question

Cracking refers to drawing district boundaries around large numbers of likeminded voters. This increases their voting power and makes it easier for them to elect a representative of their choice.

Cracking refers to drawing voting district boundaries to divide a cluster of voters who support the same political party into several districts. This dilutes their voting power and makes it harder for them to elect a representative of their choice.
Cracking refers to dividing states up into voting districts of equal geographic size. This makes it easier for voters to support candidates of their choosing in congressional elections and makes representation more fair.
Cracking refers to the process of redistricting the boundaries of voting districts every 10 years. It is a neutral process that does not affect the fairness of elections and the ability of voters to elect a representative of their choice.

Answer 1

The statement that best analyzes the significance of the gerrymandering method of cracking and its impact on effective representation is:

Cracking refers to drawing voting district boundaries to divide a cluster of voters who support the same political party into several districts. This dilutes their voting power and makes it harder for them to elect a representative of their choice.

This statement accurately describes the process of cracking and highlights its significant impact on representation by explaining how it undermines the voting power of specific groups.