The language used in discussions about "sanctuary" campuses significantly shapes public perception, often inflating fears and misunderstandings surrounding their purpose. The term "sanctuary" itself can evoke notions of protection and refuge, leading to the assumption that these campuses are unlawfully shielding individuals from legal consequences. For example, Quinton highlights that many sanctuary campuses do not provide full immunity from federal laws but instead implement policies to limit their cooperation with immigration enforcement. Additionally, the framing of these institutions as “controversial” can further skew public understanding, implying that they engage in nefarious activities when, in reality, they are often focused on supporting students' educational and emotional needs. This illustrates how language can influence attitudes and beliefs in a polarized context.
"'Sanctuary' Campuses Controversy Misleading" by Sophie Quinton
Based on your reading, make a valid inference that evaluates the impact of language on public perception. Provide at least 2 examples of factual evidence to support your inference. Use 3-5 sentences.
1 answer
1 answer