Ask a New Question
Menu

Which of the following statements describes the connection between the concept of natural rights and the American Revolution?(1 point) Responses The American colonies believed that the colonial governments were violating their natural rights and that justified the revolution. The American colonies believed that the colonial governments were violating their natural rights and that justified the revolution. The American colonies believed that their natural rights were being violated and that justified the revolution. The American colonies believed that their natural rights were being violated and that justified the revolution. The American colonies believed that the colonial governments were their way to gain natural rights and that led to the revolution. The American colonies believed that the colonial governments were their way to gain natural rights and that led to the revolution. The American colonies believed the British government was refusing to grant them natural rights and that justified the revolution.

11 answers

The statement that best describes the connection between the concept of natural rights and the American Revolution is: "The American colonies believed that their natural rights were being violated and that justified the revolution."

This reflects the Enlightenment ideas that influenced the colonists, particularly those of philosophers like John Locke, who argued that government should protect individuals' natural rights such as life, liberty, and property. The belief that the British government was infringing upon these rights led the colonies to justify their quest for independence.

Analyze the Great Compromise’s plan for distribution of power. How did it solve the dilemma of different sizes of states?(1 point) Responses It ensured that all states were represented in Congress solely based on equality. It ensured that all states were represented in Congress solely based on equality. It provided both a plan for equality and proportionality among the states. It provided both a plan for equality and proportionality among the states. It created a unicameral Congress, ensuring all states met in one location. It created a unicameral Congress, ensuring all states met in one location. It ensured all states were represented in Congress solely based on proportionality.

The statement that best analyzes the Great Compromise’s plan for distribution of power and addresses the dilemma of different sizes of states is: "It provided both a plan for equality and proportionality among the states."

The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population (providing proportional representation) and the Senate having equal representation for each state (two senators per state), regardless of size. This compromise resolved the conflict between larger states, which wanted representation based on population, and smaller states, which wanted equal representation.

Why was the Civil Rights Act considered an expansion of rights in U.S. political thought?(1 point) Responses It was the first time Indigenous Americans were acknowledged as citizens. It was the first time Indigenous Americans were acknowledged as citizens. The right to vote was given to citizens who are 18 years old. The right to vote was given to citizens who are 18 years old. Women were given the right to vote by the passage of the act. Women were given the right to vote by the passage of the act. It reaffirmed the rights granted in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.

The response that best explains why the Civil Rights Act was considered an expansion of rights in U.S. political thought is: "It reaffirmed the rights granted in the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments."

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 built upon the foundational civil rights established by these amendments, which abolished slavery, granted citizenship, and secured voting rights for African American men. The Act sought to eliminate discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, thereby expanding the scope of civil rights protections and reinforcing the principles enshrined in those earlier constitutional amendments.

Analyze the following principle of the U.S. Constitution: “The rights of people, such as the right to vote, shall not be restricted because of race, gender, religion, or other factors.” What Declaration of Independence ideal does this reflect?(1 point) Responses All people have certain rights. All people have certain rights. Governments are created by the people. Governments are created by the people. When government violates the social contract, the people have a right to overthrow it. When government violates the social contract, the people have a right to overthrow it. All people are created equal.

The principle of the U.S. Constitution stating that "the rights of people, such as the right to vote, shall not be restricted because of race, gender, religion, or other factors" reflects the Declaration of Independence ideal that: "All people are created equal."

This ideal emphasizes that all individuals hold the same inherent rights, regardless of their race, gender, or other characteristics. The principle in the Constitution seeks to ensure that these rights are protected and not denied based on arbitrary distinctions, thereby upholding the value of equality articulated in the Declaration of Independence.

Use the quote from Alexander Hamilton to answer the question. “This general and indisputable principle puts at once an end to the abstract question, whether the United States have power to erect a corporation; that is to say, to give a legal or artificial capacity to one or more persons, distinct from the natural. For it is unquestionably incident to sovereign power to erect corporations, and consequently to that of the United States, in relation to the objects intrusted to the management of the government. The difference is this: where the authority of the government is general, it can create corporations in all cases, where it is confined to certain branches of legislation, it can create corporations only in those cases. …It is not denied that there are implied well as express powers, and that the former are as effectually delegated as the latter. And for the sake of accuracy it shall be mentioned, that there is another class of powers, which may be properly denominated resulting powers. It will not be doubted, that if the United States should make a conquest of any of the territories of its neighbors, they would possess sovereign jurisdiction over the conquered territory. This would be rather a result, from the whole mass of the powers of the government, and from the nature of political society, than a consequence of either of the powers specially enumerated…” What logic is Hamilton using to defend the idea of a national bank? (1 point) Responses strict constructionism strict constructionism loose constructionism loose constructionism the power to supervise banks with the people the power to supervise banks with the people a stronger economy without banks

The logic that Alexander Hamilton is using to defend the idea of a national bank is best described as: "loose constructionism."

Hamilton argues that the federal government has the implied powers to create institutions like a national bank, even if such powers are not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution. He suggests that the government has the sovereign authority to erect corporations and that this authority can extend beyond clearly defined powers, allowing for a broader interpretation of the Constitution to meet the needs of governance. This approach reflects a loose constructionist view, which favors a flexible interpretation of the Constitution to enable the government to take actions not specifically mentioned but deemed necessary for its functioning.

How are the people able to provide input in government to protect their interests? (1 point) Responses getting involved with the community getting involved with the community by voting by voting sitting on a jury sitting on a jury the people are not able to provide input in government

The response that best captures how the people are able to provide input in government to protect their interests is: "by voting."

Voting is a fundamental way for citizens to express their preferences and influence government decisions, policies, and leadership. Through the electoral process, people can advocate for their interests, hold elected officials accountable, and shape the direction of government. While other actions, such as community involvement or serving on a jury, also play a role in civic engagement, voting is the primary mechanism for direct input in the political process.