Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source? Responses A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions. A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions. - no response given The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias. - no response given Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source. Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source. - no response given The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.
1 answer
The most relevant reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source is:
The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
Understanding the opinions of a source can help historians analyze the context, motivations, and potential biases that may influence how the facts are presented. This can provide a deeper understanding of the historical narrative.
