Question
Consider an Markov Decision Process with 6 states s∈{0,1,2,3,4,5} and 2 actions a∈{C,M}, defined by the following transition probability functions
For states 1, 2, and 3:
T(s,M,s−1)=1
T(s,C,s+2)=0.7
T(s,C,s)=0.3
For states 1, 2, and 3:
T(s,M,s−1)=1
T(s,C,s+2)=0.7
T(s,C,s)=0.3
Answers
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To analyze the given Markov Decision Process (MDP) with 6 states and 2 actions, we need to clarify the transition probabilities for each state when the actions C (Continue) and M (Move) are taken.
Here's a breakdown of the transition probabilities for actions taken in states 1, 2, and 3 based on the information provided:
### Transition Probabilities
1. **For States 1, 2, and 3:**
- Action **M (Move)**:
- From state 1: \( T(1, M, 0) = 1 \) (transition to state 0)
- From state 2: \( T(2, M, 1) = 1 \) (transition to state 1)
- From state 3: \( T(3, M, 2) = 1 \) (transition to state 2)
- Action **C (Continue)**:
- From state 1:
- \( T(1, C, 3) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 3)
- \( T(1, C, 1) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 1)
- From state 2:
- \( T(2, C, 4) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 4)
- \( T(2, C, 2) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 2)
- From state 3:
- \( T(3, C, 5) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 5)
- \( T(3, C, 3) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 3)
2. **For States 0, 4, and 5:**
- The transition probabilities for states 0, 4, and 5 need to be defined as they haven't been provided. Let's assume:
- From state 0, assuming it is an absorbing state:
- \( T(0, a, 0) = 1 \) for both actions \( a \in \{C, M\} \)
- For state 4:
- Since we don't have specific values provided, we could set some hypothetical transitions to connect state 4 to states 3 or 5.
- From state 5:
- Similar to state 0, we could assume it is also absorbing.
- \( T(5, a, 5) = 1 \) for both actions \( a \in \{C, M\} \)
### Summary of Transitions
- **Action M** leads to a deterministic move to the previous state (or state 0).
- **Action C** provides a probabilistic nature to either progress two states up or stay in the current state, with a higher probability of progressing to the next state in the sequence.
### Note:
The defined transitions will allow us to model the decision-making process in terms of expected rewards, value estimation, and optimal policy if we incorporate a reward structure and discount factor. If you have specific rewards for each state-action pair or other questions regarding value iteration, policy iteration, or specific scenarios in this MDP, please provide that information!
Here's a breakdown of the transition probabilities for actions taken in states 1, 2, and 3 based on the information provided:
### Transition Probabilities
1. **For States 1, 2, and 3:**
- Action **M (Move)**:
- From state 1: \( T(1, M, 0) = 1 \) (transition to state 0)
- From state 2: \( T(2, M, 1) = 1 \) (transition to state 1)
- From state 3: \( T(3, M, 2) = 1 \) (transition to state 2)
- Action **C (Continue)**:
- From state 1:
- \( T(1, C, 3) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 3)
- \( T(1, C, 1) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 1)
- From state 2:
- \( T(2, C, 4) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 4)
- \( T(2, C, 2) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 2)
- From state 3:
- \( T(3, C, 5) = 0.7 \) (transition to state 5)
- \( T(3, C, 3) = 0.3 \) (stay in state 3)
2. **For States 0, 4, and 5:**
- The transition probabilities for states 0, 4, and 5 need to be defined as they haven't been provided. Let's assume:
- From state 0, assuming it is an absorbing state:
- \( T(0, a, 0) = 1 \) for both actions \( a \in \{C, M\} \)
- For state 4:
- Since we don't have specific values provided, we could set some hypothetical transitions to connect state 4 to states 3 or 5.
- From state 5:
- Similar to state 0, we could assume it is also absorbing.
- \( T(5, a, 5) = 1 \) for both actions \( a \in \{C, M\} \)
### Summary of Transitions
- **Action M** leads to a deterministic move to the previous state (or state 0).
- **Action C** provides a probabilistic nature to either progress two states up or stay in the current state, with a higher probability of progressing to the next state in the sequence.
### Note:
The defined transitions will allow us to model the decision-making process in terms of expected rewards, value estimation, and optimal policy if we incorporate a reward structure and discount factor. If you have specific rewards for each state-action pair or other questions regarding value iteration, policy iteration, or specific scenarios in this MDP, please provide that information!
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!