Which of the following is irrational? Responses 52.781654292 52.781654292 - −7 8/37 negative 7 and 8 over 37 - 3.6363636363636363... 3.6363636363636363... 3√/4, why is 3√/4, the right choice

1 answer

To determine which of the given numbers is irrational, we first need to understand what irrational numbers are. An irrational number is any real number that cannot be expressed as a fraction or ratio of two integers. This means it has a non-repeating, non-terminating decimal expansion.

Let's analyze each of the given options:

  1. 52.781654292: This is a decimal representation. It is a finite decimal and can be expressed as a fraction (for example, it can be written as \(\frac{52781654292}{1000000000}\)). Therefore, this number is rational.

  2. 52.781654292 - (-7): This simplifies to \(52.781654292 + 7\), which is also a finite decimal. The result will be a finite decimal and can also be expressed as a fraction, making it rational.

  3. 8/37: This is a fraction where both the numerator and the denominator are integers, hence it is rational.

  4. -7: This is an integer and can be expressed as a fraction (\(-7 = \frac{-7}{1}\)), which means it is also rational.

  5. 3.6363636363636363...: This decimal has a repeating part (the "63"), indicating that it can be expressed as a fraction. It can be represented as \(\frac{3636}{1000} + \frac{63}{9900}\) or other equivalent forms, confirming that it is rational.

  6. \( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \): Here, \( \sqrt{3} \) is an irrational number, and when divided by a non-zero integer (4), it remains irrational. Therefore, \( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \) cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers.

Based on this analysis, \( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \) is the only irrational number among the provided options.