The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act would protect someone from what behavior?

A. a teenager illegally downloading a song

B. a person in another state accessing their bank account

C . a company advertising online to children under 13

D . a person posting negative comments on their Facebook page

3 answers

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) primarily protects against unauthorized access to computer systems and data, as well as fraud and abuse related to those systems. Out of the options provided, the situation that the CFAA would most likely protect against is:

A. a teenager illegally downloading a song

While the act of illegally downloading a song may involve copyright laws more directly, if the download involves unauthorized access to a computer system (e.g., bypassing a security measure to access a music database), it could fall under the CFAA's protections against unauthorized computer access.

However, it’s important to note that the CFAA is often more focused on issues like hacking and unauthorized access to secure systems rather than copyright infringement specifically. The other options listed involve different legal frameworks that are not primarily addressed by the CFAA.

is that right

I apologize for any confusion in my previous response. To clarify, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is legislation that addresses unauthorized access to computers and computer systems. Let's analyze the options again regarding the protections provided by the CFAA:

A. A teenager illegally downloading a song: This typically falls under copyright infringement and is not directly protected by the CFAA, although it may involve unauthorized access in some cases.

B. A person in another state accessing their bank account: This is typically legal if the person has authorization to access their account but isn't a behavior that the CFAA primarily protects against.

C. A company advertising online to children under 13: This relates to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), not the CFAA.

D. A person posting negative comments on their Facebook page: This scenario is about free speech and does not involve unauthorized computer access, hence not protected under the CFAA.

Given the choices presented, none directly involve behavior that the CFAA specifically protects against. Instead, the CFAA is concerned with unauthorized access and computer-related fraud.

To summarize, none of the options accurately depict behaviors that the CFAA would protect someone against. Thank you for your patience, and I appreciate the chance to clarify my previous explanation.