Asked by mav welborn

___ 10
900+___+6
+200+80+7
______+200+__+3

Answers

Answered by mav welborn
what the answer
Answered by GPT-4o mini
To solve the problem, we need to find the missing digits represented by the underscores in the addition problem:

```
___ 10
900+___+6
+200+80+7
______+200+__+3
```

Let's write it out clearly by filling in what we know:

1. The top part has the values contributing to the thousands place which must give a value that carries over.
2. Starting from the bottom, we notice it starts with a line, indicates a larger number, where we potentially need to identify two missing values in the thousands and hundreds.

One way to approach a problem like this is to work with the values given:

- The addition in the lower line must equal the sum of the top two addition lines.

We can do these calculations step by step. Here's what we have:

From the first equation (top):
- \( 900 + x + 6 \)
- For tens place, we have \( x + 6 + 7 \)

Then, we calculate the second part:
- \( 200 + 80 + 7 \) which equals \( 287 \)

Thus our equation looks like this:

```
___ 10
900 + x + 6
+ 200 + 80 + 7
---------------------
____ + 200 + y + 3
```

Let's assume the top row results in adding the thousands to create a large integer plus the tens.

Next, we need to assume what \( x \) could be. Since 0-9 are valid digits:

Trying successive values for \( x \):

1. \( x = 4 \)
- Then \( 10's \) place gives \( 4 + 6 + 7 = 17 \) which will carry over 1.

This suggests almost an \( 8914 \).

Now let’s final calculations:
```
900 + 4 + 6 = 910
200 + 80 + 7 = 287
Going thus summing: \( 910 + 287 =1197 \)
```
So, \( 1197 \) has a digit pattern like \( 1 _ _ + 200 + y + 3 \)

So we can solve:

Finally, plug the values in:
- First blank should likely be \( 1 \).
- The second blank after matching down should ensure that works, leaving the baby integer drawing itself.

So let's evaluate the arrangement again.

Assuming thus, this resolved:
```
___ 10
900 + 4 + 6
200 + 80 + 7
+ 1000 + 200 + y + 3
```
To finish our solution down, you need \( y = 4 \).

So the blanks fill:
- First blank: \( 1\)
- Second blank: \( 4 \)

Summing these up.
Thus, it concludes as:

```
1__ + 200 + 4 + 3
```

So, your result is \( 1197 \) as target value from equation setup which leads each interim segments adjusted correctly.

Thus,:

```
0 10
900+4+6
+200+80+7
________+200+4+3
```
Meets function of at target \( 1,197 \).

So, the answer should now position as straightforward adjustments of any additional. You just tested first through validated digit placements and cross-verifying anonymous holds through which they align properly!

The missing digits as shown: \( 1 \) and \( 4 \).
Answered by GPT-4o mini
To fill the blanks accurately and provide the final answer, let's break down the addition once again clearly:

Given the structure:

```
___ 10
900+___+6
+200+80+7
______+200+__+3
```

We'll denote the missing blanks for clarity:

```
A 10
900+B+6
+200+80+7
______+200+C+3
```

### Step 1: Analyzing the two lines of additions

The first line of addition contributes to the total in the units, tens and hundreds places.

- The second line of numbers is \( 900 + B + 6 + 200 + 80 + 7 \).

### Step 2: Calculate the bottom addition

Calculating that step by step:

1. From the second line:
\[
900 + B + 6 = 906 + B
\]

2. From the third line:
\[
200 + 80 + 7 = 287
\]

So now the overall addition on the right before summarizing the answer is:
\[
(906 + B) + 287
\]
Combining:
\[
1193 + B
\]

### Step 3: Solving

The structure should meet the line below it, which has the format:
\[
_____ + 200 + C + 3
\]
That should equal \( 1193 + B \).

**Assessment of the Thousands:**
Since we have \( A\) likely as 1 (based on thousand capacity). That would be:

\[
1 \text{(thousand)} + (200) + C + 3
\]

which simplifies to \( 1000 + 200 + C + 3 \) or \( 1203 + C \).

### Setting Up the Equation:

Thus, aligning both sides will yield:
\[
1193 + B = 1203 + C
\]

From that we get:

### Step 4: Finding B and C:

Assuming various iterations:
1. Setting \( C\) exhausts towards differences aligned at:
\[
B - C = 10
\]

This implies simply trying sequences until profiled:
1. If \( B = 4\):
\[
4 - C = 10 → C = -6 \text{ (impossible)}
\]

2. If \( B = 3\):
\[
3 - C = 10 → C = -7 \text{ (impossible)}
\]

3. Assuming strictly alignments through each adjustment, finally summing:
\[
Should lead \( B = 2, C = 8. \text{ (valid)}
\]

The outwork thus should yield as:
***

So:
- \( A = 1 \)
- \( B = 2 \)
- \( C = 8 \)

### Final form:

Thus filling:
```
1 10
900 + 2 + 6
+200 + 80 + 7
1203 + 200 + 8 + 3
```

Final answer after all blank fillings yield conclusion:
1,203 from above configurations matching for any split verifies outcomes.

**Answer:**
- The first missing digit is **1**.
- The second missing digit under the last equals **8**.

**Final alignment total:** is \( **1,203**\).