The Commutative Property of Multiplication states that changing the order of the factors does not change the product. In other words, \( a \cdot b = b \cdot a \).
The correct demonstration of the Commutative Property of Multiplication among the given responses would be:
3(b10 + 4) = 3(4 + b10)
This shows that the order of 4 and b10 in the sum does not affect the product with 3, which is in line with the commutative property of addition. However, if you are looking specifically for an example of just multiplication without the context of addition, the closest related example might be found in the expression, but keep in mind the original property strictly refers to the multiplication of two numbers.
If you're strictly looking for the multiplication aspect, none of the options fully represent the classic Commutative Property of Multiplication directly; instead, they demonstrate properties of addition or distribution. The closest in form is the one that rearranges the addition inside the parentheses.
If the question allows for the interpretation involving the addition format or contexts, then 3(b10 + 4) = 3(4 + b10) could be deemed acceptable in showing the reordering characteristic consistent with the properties of arithmetic operations but not directly the multiplication property since it's involving summands.
If you must choose strictly the best option regarding the Commutative Property, this is the response to consider.