The section “Why it matters” refines the author’s claim that people are saving bees “to death” by specifying that commercial bees and bee-friendly flowers are likely contributing to, rather than fixing, bee population decline. This clarification highlights that well-intentioned efforts, such as planting flowers, may inadvertently harm bee populations by supporting practices associated with commercial beekeeping that can lead to negative consequences for both wild and commercial bees.
How does the section “Why it matters” refine the author’s claim that people are saving bees “to death”? (1 point) Responses by explaining that habitat destruction is not a factor in bee population decline, despite the general assumption that it is by explaining that habitat destruction is not a factor in bee population decline, despite the general assumption that it is by outlining the reasons why planting flowers near commercial bee populations is harming, rather than helping, bees by outlining the reasons why planting flowers near commercial bee populations is harming, rather than helping, bees by specifying that commercial bees and bee-friendly flowers are likely contributing to, rather than fixing, bee population decline by specifying that commercial bees and bee-friendly flowers are likely contributing to, rather than fixing, bee population decline by describing how viruses in wild bee populations spread to commercial bees, despite prior assumptions that this was impossible by describing how viruses in wild bee populations spread to commercial bees, despite prior assumptions that this was impossible Skip to navigation
1 answer
1 answer