To solve this, we first need to simplify the expression \( (9 \times 100) + (2 \times 10) + (3 \times 110) + (5 \times 1100) \).
Let's calculate each term step-by-step:
- \( 9 \times 100 = 900 \)
- \( 2 \times 10 = 20 \)
- \( 3 \times 110 = 330 \)
- \( 5 \times 1100 = 5500 \)
Now, we add all these values together:
\[ 900 + 20 + 330 + 5500 \]
Calculating it step-by-step:
- \( 900 + 20 = 920 \)
- \( 920 + 330 = 1250 \)
- \( 1250 + 5500 = 6750 \)
So, \( (9 \times 100) + (2 \times 10) + (3 \times 110) + (5 \times 1100) = 6750 \).
Now we need to convert \( 6750 \) to a decimal format.
\( 6750 \) can be represented in decimal form as:
- \( 6750.00 \)
- \( 6750.0 \)
- and so on, but it must have the value \( 6750 \).
Now we match this with the options provided:
A. \( 92.35 \) - Not equivalent
B. \( 920.350 \) - Not equivalent
C. \( 902.35 \) - Not equivalent
D. \( 92.350 \) - Not equivalent
E. \( 920.035 \) - Not equivalent
None of the options accurately represent \( 6750 \). Hence, the answer is none of the options.
If these were supposed to be a misunderstanding of additional operations or context, please clarify how to interpret this further.